From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Deniz Dogan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7545: 24.0.50; (elisp) `Simple Types' Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 15:57:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4E0F23D2.1010205@dogan.se> References: <4EF744340E21483ABFE942FA8F1F2C12@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309615169 4428 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2011 13:59:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7545@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 02 15:59:25 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd0jE-0007se-HF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 15:59:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49229 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd0jD-0006UN-TD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:59:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd0iv-0006Tr-Bc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:59:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd0it-00039r-Jz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42405) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd0it-00039k-A7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd0is-0006oC-EN; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Deniz Dogan Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 13:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7545 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 7545-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7545.130961511626133 (code B ref 7545); Sat, 02 Jul 2011 13:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7545) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2011 13:58:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd0iS-0006nS-Hg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:58:36 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.153.6]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd0iQ-0006nA-Du for 7545@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:58:35 -0400 Original-Received: from c80-216-105-155.bredband.comhem.se ([80.216.105.155]:62605 helo=[192.168.0.10]) by ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd0hn-0003Mz-GV; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 15:57:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: 80.216.105.155 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Qd0hn-0003Mz-GV. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net 1Qd0hn-0003Mz-GV ce821552a9b5e4267f06f99b53a3e146 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:59:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47749 Archived-At: On 2011-07-02 15:50, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > "Drew Adams" writes: > >> Why are types `alist' and `plist' considered simple types? Seems like >> they are like `cons', `repeat', and `list', not like `string' and >> `symbol'. They are structures with component types. Don't they belong >> in node `Composite Types'? > > That seems logical. But this report was marked as "notabug", but > doesn't show how it got that mark. Anybody know what that means? > It could mean that someone (I don't remember who has access) changed it straight in the database. This has happened to one of my bug reports before.