From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8911: bs-cycle-next deletes window in some cases. Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:00:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4E082AA8.3010807@gmx.at> References: <4E009EB0.1050903@gmx.at> <181538AC4C8B4765A99060E0425B9AB5@us.oracle.com> <9170F33E41584E0B8D96DD5EFC84599E@us.oracle.com> <8E864413162C4814BE8EFFD0C1FA1989@us.oracle.com> <4E06FBF8.9040205@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309158694 28242 80.91.229.12 (27 Jun 2011 07:11:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8911@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 27 09:11:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qb5yj-00089S-Al for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:11:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50939 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qb5yh-0001LW-PX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:11:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qb5pd-0007a6-M8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:02:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qb5pa-0005df-Tl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:02:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qb5pa-0005dX-J1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qb5pZ-0008LV-Rx; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:02:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8911 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8911-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8911.130915806732018 (code B ref 8911); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2011 07:01:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qb5og-0008KN-KL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:01:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qb5oe-0008Jt-5U for 8911@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:01:05 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2011 07:00:57 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-45-136.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.45.136]) [62.47.45.136] by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2011 09:00:57 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+jRv9iXG2jJhcgyjxwKm9im9tnZFW+goZHAzPj9q sC993lzeALkjh5 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:02:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47529 Archived-At: > If switch-to-buffer is changed not to fallback on pop-to-buffer, why > shouldn't it be called from elisp? In the case of bs-cycle-next: > > (unless (window-dedicated-p (selected-window)) > ;; We don't want the frame iconified if the only window in the frame > ;; happens to be dedicated > (bury-buffer (current-buffer))) > (switch-to-buffer next) > > the current switch-to-buffer causes the unwanted-splitting behavior. > Changing it to pop-to-buffer-same-window, as its docstring suggests, > would still cause the same problem. `switch-to-buffer' has a specific window show a specific buffer. The user cannot change that via options. `pop-to-buffer-same-window' tries to show a specific buffer in a specific window. But the user can change that via options. In particular, the user can decide to override the splitting behavior, dedicatedness of windows, ... All `bs-cycle-next' has to do is call it via (pop-to-buffer-same-window next nil 'bs-cycle-next) martin