From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8865: 24.0.50; `display-buffer' does not respect `pop-up-frames' Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:01:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4DF9FEA7.1050509@gmx.at> References: <4DF7B1BB.6050704@gmx.at><4DF87A4F.60704@gmx.at><5F95025D0ABE4561A305F30293828F38@us.oracle.com><4DF8DD1E.8080004@gmx.at><68E985ED37824BE799A9C01162553E22@us.oracle.com><4DF8EF87.8080903@gmx.at> <7923A876A42744A39EEC6AAB67362EAC@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308232071 30820 80.91.229.12 (16 Jun 2011 13:47:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:47:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8865@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 16 15:47:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXCvB-0007TB-7I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:47:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42786 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXCvA-0000lK-8w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:47:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59171) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXCdB-00040U-1S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:29:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXCd5-0004Xj-7A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXCd4-0004XZ-Ly for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXCd4-0000Tu-5G; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8865.13082309001798 (code B ref 8865); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2011 13:28:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXCcO-0000Sx-KN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:28:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXCcM-0000Sf-4V for 8865@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2011 13:01:29 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-41-3.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.41.3]) [62.47.41.3] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 16 Jun 2011 15:01:29 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19OJP5rXFFOOEEIIcCxR45TER4Bv348NKO7nfYi4T 3hnI9f5fcGKVJ6 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:29:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47232 Archived-At: > BTW, can you tell me what is a reasonable substitute for tests of > `pop-up-frames' now? That is, what to do about code that has (if pop-up-frames > ...)? What is the replacement for such a test in Emacs 24? Thx. Please decide together with David Engster where to bring the current discussion of bug#8857 to and try to give it an appropriate title. I can't find the idiom (if pop-up-frames in the current trunk so I would first like to know why and how it is used. `sunrise-sunset' uses (if pop-up-windows but I'm quite confident that this is not TRT to do. martin