From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8435: misuse of error ("...%d...", ...) on 64-bit hosts Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:59:29 -0700 Message-ID: <4DB4C771.6090107@gmail.com> References: <4D9CC60D.2090301@cs.ucla.edu> <4D9D68D8.6060200@cs.ucla.edu> <8339ltvrok.fsf@gnu.org> <4D9E21FB.70802@cs.ucla.edu> <83vcypt8zf.fsf@gnu.org> <4D9F9C55.3040502@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303693660 20534 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2011 01:07:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 01:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8435@debbugs.gnu.org To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 25 03:07:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEAH2-00037b-On for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 03:07:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51366 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEAH1-0000NC-Pf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:07:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEAGy-0000Mn-Od for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:07:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEAGy-0007oU-0t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:07:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEAGx-0007oQ-Ua for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:07:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEA9k-0006Sh-0o; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:00:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daniel Colascione Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 01:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8435 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.130369319424799 (code B ref -1); Mon, 25 Apr 2011 01:00:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2011 00:59:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEA9Z-0006Rw-EA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:59:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEA9W-0006Rh-Eq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:59:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEA9Q-0006cv-L8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:59:45 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:53934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEA9Q-0006cr-Jb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:59:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53061) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEA9P-0007oO-RN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:59:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEA9O-0006cf-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:59:43 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:49472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEA9O-0006cb-Jv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:59:42 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEA9N-0008VI-9k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 02:59:41 +0200 Original-Received: from c-67-183-23-114.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([67.183.23.114]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 02:59:41 +0200 Original-Received: from dan.colascione by c-67-183-23-114.hsd1.wa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 02:59:41 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-67-183-23-114.hsd1.wa.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: <4D9F9C55.3040502@cs.ucla.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:00:04 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45977 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 4/8/11 4:37 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 04/08/2011 01:58 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> I also don't think we should remove message_nolog, even if it's >> currently unused. It's a useful function. If someone feels badly >> about having dead code, we could #ifdef it away > > That would be OK too. Or we could simply retrieve it from the > repository if we ever need it again. The problem with using the change history as a code library that way is that nobody knows functions like message_nolog are available. Better, IMHO, it leave it in the code. Even if we compile it in, a good linker ought to remove it, yes? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk20x3AACgkQ17c2LVA10VsY8gCg6EOSQwfP6c9H1YbHP8SQ/egm k7QAoKtnfklc5oMFMIo74oaGJEuxq6od =WOuZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----