From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8358: 24.0.50; `minibuffer-scroll-window' with active minibuffer: always *Completions*? Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:54:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4D919E4D.6060701@gmx.at> References: <85A4B6FC9D55449098D84231439FAF9B@us.oracle.com><4D902BEF.7050107@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301391493 31237 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2011 09:38:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8358@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 11:38:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4VNG-0001PB-V0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:38:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51629 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4VNG-0001UH-FD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53922 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4VMP-0000uJ-Bi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:37:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4VMN-0000wK-JY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:37:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4VMN-0000wF-Dy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4V2t-00011i-43; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:17:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:17:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8358 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8358-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8358.13013901893897 (code B ref 8358); Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:17:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2011 09:16:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4V2L-00010o-IR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:16:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4V2K-00010T-7v for 8358@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:16:28 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2011 09:16:21 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-60-40.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.60.40]) [62.47.60.40] by mail.gmx.net (mp041) with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 11:16:21 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19LM5M+SNpLuzMXEKACJLKVy1G4gSGYgidNh38BBZ stlXzUCox40tRV User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:17:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45463 Archived-At: >> No, not to "let you ..." but to "let code ...". > > So you are excluding user code. On the contrary. All code is created equal. martin