From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1077: 23.0.60; x-create-frame: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p nil) Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:58:45 +0100 Message-ID: <4CF61C55.60306@gmx.at> References: <003e01c9257c$a385d800$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <009701c9263f$9cce7120$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <000001c94cc1$e10e9c40$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <8F1F8998D60341099C4204B7BDD8AD4F@us.oracle.com> <96BC00F728B94AC18A15EA95B66C5248@us.oracle.com> <83zksv5g7j.fsf@gnu.org> <0A475933984F4CDA855D91C8B7639E3B@us.oracle.com> <83fwum5xzk.fsf@gnu.org> <9F24875655894485A414CD785D95725B@us.oracle.com> <83ipzh9qze.fsf@gnu.org> <4CF386C9.5070909@gmx.at> <8362vg9ctt.fsf@gnu.org> <4CF409A3.1030906@gmx.at> <83y68b96c5.fsf@gnu.org> <71C125BECEDF4C5E9F703E5743F76893@us.oracle.com> <83r5e38nhg.fsf@gnu.org> <4CF4AE39.4050007@gmx.at> <4CF503A5.3030404@gmx.at> <4CF52EBF.6020107@gmx.at> <0C2D07EAE2D04BA498890195EA23B8CF@us.oracle.com> <83ipze8y5i.fsf@gnu.org> <4CF55571.1020402@gmx.at> <36EAA476B3E94D99A96F2BFB1553353A@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291199438 22114 80.91.229.12 (1 Dec 2010 10:30:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1077@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 01 11:30:34 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNjxI-0001iQ-2l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:30:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32977 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNjxG-0002Zc-US for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:30:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47880 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNjiM-0005Fn-C3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:15:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNjiK-0003k7-2x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:15:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43703) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNjiK-0003jy-14 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:15:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNjNy-00058a-Io; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 04:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1077 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 1077-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1077.129119719419678 (code B ref 1077); Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1077) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2010 09:53:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNjNB-00057L-Pt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 04:53:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23] helo=mail.gmx.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNjN8-000575-1k for 1077@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 04:53:11 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Dec 2010 09:58:47 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-41-210.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.41.210]) [62.47.41.210] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 01 Dec 2010 10:58:47 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19RoGs7YhVRJKdv8yAE9sfQfQyPZDTv4mtrPb7F2P IJPoVyONAsQTj0 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <36EAA476B3E94D99A96F2BFB1553353A@us.oracle.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 04:54:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42050 Archived-At: > If so, then both (a) it should be possible for the minibuffer frame to have a > menu-bar - just like a "normal" frame, The code for such a menu-bar must be either designed specifically for such a frame or the current menu-bar.el code must be redesigned to accomodate the pecularities of the minibuffer frame. Neither of these is simple as the current problems indicate. > and (b) it should be possible for the > `Minibuf' menu-bar menu to be shown when you use a standalone minibuffer frame. You mean a Minibuf entry from some other "normal" frame? When you go to such an entry with the mouse you very likely automatically select the associated frame too and probably get some very convoluted semantics wrt the selected frame. Besides, what would you do when there's no "normal" frame? martin