From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7503: copy-and-insert-previous-line Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:04:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4CF26F7D.5020705@gmx.at> References: <4CF22EA9.3020207@inducks.org> <4CF2636C.6030105@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290957352 13351 80.91.229.12 (28 Nov 2010 15:15:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, mje@inducks.org, 7503@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 28 16:15:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMiyD-00043w-Bf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:15:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40489 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMiyC-00036D-CO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:15:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43864 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMixz-00032M-AE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:15:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMixy-0004Yv-9u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMixy-0004Yr-76 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMijT-000833-RO; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:00:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7503 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7503-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7503.129095635030856 (code B ref 7503); Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:00:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7503) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2010 14:59:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMiic-00081d-EG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:59:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23] helo=mail.gmx.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMiiZ-00081Q-Eb for 7503@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:59:08 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2010 15:04:37 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-46-250.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.46.250]) [62.47.46.250] by mail.gmx.net (mp039) with SMTP; 28 Nov 2010 16:04:37 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19DLCpx6KxDDP3IvioWo+2Fc2NJCtebwFTqKFIOjO CqkasumP/WU7Ds User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:00:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41963 Archived-At: >>> What's wrong with line-beginning-position and line-end-position? >> Field boundaries? > > "To ignore field boundaries bind `inhibit-field-text-motion' to t." Sure. But why bother? `line-beginning-position' does `forward-line' internally anyway. martin