From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7296: display-pixel-height not enough Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:25:49 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD0115D.8050008@swipnet.se> References: <4CCAC90B.4070800@swipnet.se> <4CCB2713.5070104@swipnet.se> <4CCBC930.5060705@swipnet.se> <4CCBF75B.8070209@swipnet.se> <4CCC558E.5030704@swipnet.se> <7C6D3056-3E04-46E5-A731-A2E996197F03@swipnet.se> <4CCD4A1C.6070707@swipnet.se> <4CCEA66C.8060900@swipnet.se> <4CCF1753.6010707@swipnet.se> <83hbg06b9q.fsf@gnu.org> <83eib467v2.fsf@gnu.org> <4CCF64BE.7020808@gnu.org> <83aals5q7w.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288709557 3009 80.91.229.12 (2 Nov 2010 14:52:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:52:37 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 02 15:52:33 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDIDq-0007X6-AD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 15:52:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43361 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDHwU-0003UT-Qj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:34:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33814 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDH9D-0003Ve-Nu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:43:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDH98-0001zd-G0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:43:35 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50086) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDH98-0001zK-Dl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:43:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDGoL-0007em-MY; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:22:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Jan D." Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.128870410229405 (code B ref -1); Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2010 13:21:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDGo2-0007eE-4r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:21:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDGo0-0007e9-1p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:21:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDGsC-0000zH-1b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:26:01 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:59004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDGsB-0000zD-VT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:25:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33814 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDGsA-0003Ve-8u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:25:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDGs8-0000xl-Ki for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:25:58 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay-h21.telenor.se ([195.54.99.196]:55842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDGs8-0000vT-8Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:25:56 -0400 Original-Received: from ipb2.telenor.se (ipb2.telenor.se [195.54.127.165]) by smtprelay-h21.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0BAE9BFB for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:25:51 +0100 (CET) X-SENDER-IP: [85.225.45.100] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aow2AAuuz0xV4S1kPGdsb2JhbACHcIt7jXwMAQEBATUtwByFRQSNXRk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,281,1286143200"; d="scan'208";a="145458645" Original-Received: from c-642de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.100]) by ipb2.telenor.se with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2010 14:25:51 +0100 Original-Received: from [10.225.16.194] (unknown [193.45.43.33]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AD8B7FA05A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:25:50 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <83aals5q7w.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:22:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41365 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii skrev 2010-11-02 05:01: >> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:09:18 +0800 >> From: Jason Rumney >> Cc: >> >> On 02/11/2010 05:40, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >>>> I mean maximize height only, maximize width only and fullscreen. I >>>> think those are missing. >>>> >>> I suspect they cannot be implemented with any degree of accuracy, not >>> with an arbitrary wm. But that's me. >>> >> They are already implemented for X > Where? Maybe I misunderstood, but my impression from this discussion > was that they aren't and actually the need for them and their utility > are debatable. > In xterm.c, do_ewmh_fullscreen. I don't know why you say they are debatable, it is the only way to correctly make an Emacs frame full height or full width or fullscreen or maximized. It lets the WM do the job, so Emacs doesn't need to count pixels and panels and taskbars and autohide and whatever. Jan D.