From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7296: display-pixel-height not enough Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:40:34 +0100 Message-ID: <4CCEA732.4070805@swipnet.se> References: <83hbg66vt4.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3qt77lj.fsf@gnu.org> <4CCA9E5D.5060002@swipnet.se> <838w1h6zbp.fsf@gnu.org> <4CCAC90B.4070800@swipnet.se> <4CCB2713.5070104@swipnet.se> <4CCBC930.5060705@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288611817 16780 80.91.229.12 (1 Nov 2010 11:43:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7296@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 01 12:43:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCsnS-0001GO-TC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:43:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36641 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PCsnS-0004vd-7O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:43:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46351 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PCsnJ-0004u9-4S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:43:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCsnG-0003ZX-QC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:43:20 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCsnG-0003ZT-LV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCshB-0003Kb-W5; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7296.128861137812797 (code B ref 7296); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2010 11:36:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCsgT-0003KM-Vb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay-h22.telenor.se ([195.54.99.197]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCsgS-0003KH-It for 7296@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:36:17 -0400 Original-Received: from ipb4.telenor.se (ipb4.telenor.se [195.54.127.167]) by smtprelay-h22.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0E1E9070 for <7296@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:40:35 +0100 (CET) X-SENDER-IP: [85.225.45.100] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At0xALxDzkxV4S1kPGdsb2JhbACDGYRSmWoMAQEBATUtqg+RNoEigzBzBIUPiE0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,273,1286143200"; d="scan'208";a="1686582889" Original-Received: from c-642de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.100]) by ipb4.telenor.se with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2010 12:40:34 +0100 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.2] (gaffa [172.20.199.2]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BC07FA05A; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:40:34 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:37:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41333 Archived-At: 2010-11-01 11:20, Lennart Borgman skrev: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:46 AM, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu > wrote: >> I mean compatibility with previous versions. > > But is not the current version of display-pixel-height/width kind of > bogus since it does not give the actual useable working area? What documentation says that display-pixel-height/width is that? > > >> Anyway, no matter how you try to specify position/size in detail at >> the Lisp level, additional constraints are forced by the window >> manager on X11 and the Cocoa framework on Mac OS X. And such >> additional constraints actually solve the problem in your motivating >> example in the first place. It looks more natural to implement such >> constraints in the remaining environment, i.e., W32. > > I see. Yes, maybe. I will have a look at it. (But I would still > suggest changing display-pixel-height/width.) No, that way lies madness. If you really feel you must fiddle with pixels yourself introduce new variables/functions. Jan D.