From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34776: Acknowledgement (27.0.50; Some questions about choose-completion-string-functions) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:24:41 +0300 Message-ID: <4CAA6D9F-0402-489C-8DD1-CE2ADBAA42C9@gnu.org> References: <871s3jeh8m.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zhq4zzcz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871s3a90qo.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87imvmbube.fsf@gmail.com> <87mukyiczg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877ec2iau1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="99212"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android Cc: 34776@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 10 10:25:19 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8Xk-000PXK-Ec for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:25:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55638 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8Xe-0006NM-49 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8XX-0006N2-0Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8XW-0007sg-3K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8XV-0007sa-SO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8XV-0002xm-Mw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:25:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34776 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34776-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34776.155488469711376 (code B ref 34776); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34776) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2019 08:24:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52380 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8XQ-0002xQ-LV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:24:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39580) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8XO-0002xD-8i for 34776@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:24:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8XG-0007kM-0Y; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:24:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [109.253.166.16] (port=38085 helo=[10.131.121.239]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8XE-0004NK-GJ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:24:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877ec2iau1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157454 Archived-At: On April 10, 2019 10:22:14 AM GMT+03:00, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: >=20 > > On April 10, 2019 9:35:47 AM GMT+03:00, Eric Abrahamsen > wrote: > >> Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>=20 > >> > On April 10, 2019 6:29:10 AM GMT+03:00, Glenn Morris > > >> wrote: > >> >>=20 > >> >> > And it can go to emacs-26 since it's a doc fix=2E > >> >>=20 > >> >> The RC said Emacs 26=2E2 was to be released March 27=2E=2E=2E > >> >> Part of making a release is for people to stop changing that > >> branch=2E > >> > > >> > Unfortunately, that ship has sailed, since within an hour of RC > >> > release a new commit was pushed to the release branch, and > another > >> one > >> > a week later, without asking=2E So now the RC tarball will not be > able > >> > to be renamed anyway, and the rationale for withholding doc > changes > >> is > >> > null and void=2E > >> > > >> > "Best laid plans" and all that=2E > >>=20 > >> This sounds like a job for a git hook=2E I pay fairly close attention > to > >> emacs=2Edevel for someone who isn't an Emacs dev, and apparently I > >> missed > >> this billboard=2E > > > > Not sure which billboard jou think you missed, but in general, I > don't > > see here any problem for which a commit hook would be a good > solution=2E > > The existing hooks are already annoying enough, and are too easy to > > bypass to be reliable=2E >=20 > What I meant was: if 200 people have the ability to push to the repo, > but 50 of them aren't checking the mailing lists regularly, then you > call a halt to an RC, that's 50 people who don't know they shouldn't > push=2E It seems like a lot more work to chase after those 50 than to > close the gate and reject pushes to that particular release=2E There's no need to check the mailing list, this stuff is in CONTRIBUTE=2E = That's why I never called for any halts=2E