From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6674: PATCH: fix assignment of grep-find-use-xargs on Windows Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:03:29 -0600 Message-ID: <4C564391.8000904@gmail.com> References: <878w564xtc.fsf@telefonica.net> <871vax3fox.fsf@telefonica.net> <4C464307.8050407@gmail.com> <83pqyhcwit.fsf@gnu.org> <4C562BB7.6000702@gmail.com> <83aap5zp4d.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280722089 13157 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2010 04:08:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 04:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 02 06:08:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmJq-0004jG-NF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 06:08:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40962 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfmJp-0001rP-HB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32804 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfmJj-0001rK-99 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:08:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmJi-0007su-9Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:07:59 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmJi-0007sp-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:07:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmFu-0000DG-5H; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Christoph Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 04:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6674 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.1280721804810 (code B ref -1); Mon, 02 Aug 2010 04:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2010 04:03:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmFH-0000D1-Pn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmFF-0000Cv-4K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:03:21 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:40782) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmFa-0008GG-Rz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:03:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40900 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfmFZ-00011m-2C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:03:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmFX-0007Mw-Dd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:03:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:41303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmFT-0007MB-AE; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:03:35 -0400 Original-Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so1554991gxk.0 for ; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:03:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qdr7dNOi7MfDSxlpXLFNf5v/lhmYH+twRMKzP9pohis=; b=i3vohORpo4CH+KBhJrVCv4EJQhmaKYuN09lptRwxklBS/Ur3aqDCOX0zdbR1L+Nn6d LltHcJ3FJBB1TS3PmvXCgOJ3j6QSi8e1rhY9aLo7KqODu2+UAPlyOxa6xN0Z6pLbBcqm pBfe1tzYdPWLUM8Ey+3N275QU+ZH/+0EH1/vQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=E+8AijOxcNxF7ha8Ldu+w8YuoNuA7Z6NPMfDDqETdWZV8It84tgh+Vo/OrsG+eJqlm 9a8K2muT5fnc1folXoWnzx36DBuyyT3WzuO1BwKnzWZEXOoQtXxo0XH/LiqceaHIAs0v F0woVaytail9YEbA1tqwPHls5O77K/wIeR+og= Original-Received: by 10.101.185.6 with SMTP id m6mr5677713anp.22.1280721814836; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:03:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.4] (184-96-103-154.hlrn.qwest.net [184.96.103.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p12sm8943357ane.14.2010.08.01.21.03.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:03:34 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 In-Reply-To: <83aap5zp4d.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:04:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:39130 Archived-At: On 8/1/2010 9:10 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > No. That's because the DOS port doesn't call command.com at all. It > has its own implementation of a shell as part of the `system' function > in the standard library it links against. That implementation > supports pipes, redirection, quoting, long (up to 16KB) command lines, > and a few other minor Posix features, like /dev/null. I see. Just out of curiosity, why can't this shell implementation be used for Windows? >> Do we want to execute the batch file only in case of cmd.exe or for both >> command.com and cmd.exe? > > Yes, for the benefit of Windows 9X. Sounds good. Thanks.