From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:58:03 -0600 Message-ID: <4C56424B.8060007@gmail.com> References: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> <876301cbfz.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <4C5621BA.6020601@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280722096 13177 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2010 04:08:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 04:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6736@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 02 06:08:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmJt-0004kc-LI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 06:08:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40997 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfmJt-0001uR-21 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:08:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32817 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfmJl-0001rQ-BG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmJj-0007tJ-Pe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:08:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34080) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmJj-0007tB-MT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:07:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmA6-0000AZ-2B; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Christoph Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 03:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6736.1280721468645 (code B ref 6736); Mon, 02 Aug 2010 03:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2010 03:57:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ofm9s-0000AM-Hh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:57:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ofm9q-0000AG-52 for 6736@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:57:46 -0400 Original-Received: by gwaa18 with SMTP id a18so1176761gwa.3 for <6736@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:58:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZX0WGWQ66x+44YrzFuGpfSZEadIx1IhQrD2qIS5fbZI=; b=SDd7Tuhk9vfutEUQRw4cCLTZ85m/A/7bR4xddacQJ2s0WTUlNSfHk08kWUaz7qZcfj 5kvitZXzzkIObBf8EVu64TDdoZyZRqcFUzMxPQBKZZOfPBgp2w1lvK78IAifOAbdWDKj iqMJMRBbi0ZQv9a3DwUILgSjcMY07mVXa8RAc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pBDSfNNzErtdzJrr+SaNliJy0b0XcOA6nqQmKEcdJ5A7Zo3GIufPg7k3DU+CAHKf6A /6+a31Jye9I5rJU1N1IOkJGXV2S7x5Iw4euInl+oHUp/wfBKZtQuEgprknw8l9TQpTr6 DQlOn9MbErNljIVOXEWEVq6IkCn/K6Zxq44eA= Original-Received: by 10.100.239.14 with SMTP id m14mr275479anh.28.1280721488253; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.4] (184-96-103-154.hlrn.qwest.net [184.96.103.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b17sm8937846anh.5.2010.08.01.20.58.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:58:07 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:58:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:39131 Archived-At: On 8/1/2010 8:42 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: >> OK. What about the site-lisp directory? Is it safe to delete it too or could >> the user have files in it that he does not want to loose? > > Isn't that the whole point of site-lisp? Right. I guess I will rephrase the question: is there ever a situation where we SHOULD delete the site-lisp directory, specifically with `make maintainer-clean'?