From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:44:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4C15191A.50009@gmx.at> References: <4C12383E.5030405@gmx.at> <4C133EBB.5090702@gmx.at> <4C148E0C.7000201@gmx.at> <7F2242DF262349D8A22BB9285AAADE85@us.oracle.com> <4C14EC69.5000608@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276451923 11474 80.91.229.12 (13 Jun 2010 17:58:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6385@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 13 19:58:42 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrSC-0005UX-Cg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:58:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34577 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONrSB-0003Za-OC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:58:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57672 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONrS1-0003YT-T9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:58:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrS0-00080p-IT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:58:29 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrS0-00080k-Eu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:58:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrFy-0006UI-30; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6385 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6385-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6385.127645111424906 (code B ref 6385); Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6385) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jun 2010 17:45:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrFC-0006Te-0h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:45:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrF9-0006TV-CK for 6385@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:45:12 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2010 17:45:04 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-51-219.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.51.219]) [62.47.51.219] by mail.gmx.net (mp061) with SMTP; 13 Jun 2010 19:45:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18CgT8Wf2sCNebScq/8F85ektdCyEv+8samKEJB59 f/vtq8Qeu3om/h User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:46:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37747 Archived-At: > I think it is very practical to be able to do let-bind > window-min-height this way. I can look at the code of course and found > out, but where is is possible deleting of small height windows done? With the first call to delete_window in enlarge_window. This deletes the argument window if its new size is less than `window-min-height'. And size_window calls delete_window on any window whose size has become too small when (virtually) resizing a parent window back to its original size. > Is there a thought behind it or is it a bug? The thought behind it was probably that anyone who wants to enlarge a window also accepts that other windows may get deleted in the process. I suppose "collateral damage" has become the terminus technicus for such behavior. martin