From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6204: vc-dir always splits the frame Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 16:51:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4BFD3580.8080804@gmx.at> References: <4jwrv35d7a.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <878w7fa7cr.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BF504B4.50408@gmx.at> <4BF5736B.1030605@gmx.at> <4BF79ABA.7080006@gmx.at> <87ljbbv4u4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87y6fbqtq2.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BF91C54.4070608@gmx.at> <4BF97C5B.409@gmx.at> <4BFBEE76.7000003@gmx.at> <4BFC099E.2000404@gmx.at> <4BFCDC3A.3000300@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274886737 4612 80.91.229.12 (26 May 2010 15:12:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:12:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6204@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 26 17:12:15 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHIHH-0004iI-2I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 17:12:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42042 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHIHF-00020h-OG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:12:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36984 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHI2t-0001Z0-C5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 10:57:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHI2r-0005nm-7H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 10:57:23 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHI2r-0005nd-4k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 10:57:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHHxh-00080V-M8; Wed, 26 May 2010 10:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6204.127488551630773 (code B ref 6204); Wed, 26 May 2010 14:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2010 14:51:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHHxb-00080I-FR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 10:51:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHHxa-00080D-7l for 6204@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 10:51:54 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 May 2010 14:51:48 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-53-121.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.53.121]) [62.47.53.121] by mail.gmx.net (mp048) with SMTP; 26 May 2010 16:51:48 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/LwWkTM+7Ldb7pH61lNCWw3L94TJR6Gegjulh5rd TkammQv0KHZAnW User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:52:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37295 Archived-At: > I'd force display-buffer-reuse-frames to t and forget about it ;-) So make it obsolete? >> I suppose these are the values for all buffers not mentioned by >> `special-display-regexps'. > > Pretty much, yes. > >> What if `pop-up-windows' is nil and "default-params" indicates that >> the application wants to pop up a window (but does not insist). >> Probably `pop-up-windows' should prevail in this case. > > No, the application's choice should prevail because it's more specific. I thought the idea was that an application can override a user's customizations iff it explicitly states that. So should `pop-up-windows' be considered a "weaker" option than `special-display-regexps' wrt the argument of `display-buffer'? martin