From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5122: Mismatched parentheses when dealing with huge buffercontent Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:35:04 -0700 Message-ID: <4B1D234D72E74862B791343391DBE90B@us.oracle.com> References: <87ocmdw33d.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <838wdhjdpj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310579855 2274 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2011 17:57:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Chong Yidong' , 'MON KEY' , 5122@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen'" , "'Stefan Monnier'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 13 19:57:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh3gg-0006T0-Cy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:57:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39756 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh3gf-0000OZ-Bn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:57:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35035) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh2Pt-0003ET-JF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:36:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh2Pr-0007sU-8I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh2Pq-0007sO-Ri for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh2Pq-0003XC-7O; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5122 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 5122-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5122.131057492213527 (code B ref 5122); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5122) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2011 16:35:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh2PB-0003W8-S9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:35:22 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh2P9-0003Vu-Jm for 5122@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:35:20 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p6DGZB4h007475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:35:13 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6DGZAR4014010 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:35:10 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt105.oracle.com (abhmt105.oracle.com [141.146.116.57]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p6DGZ4Wp009561; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:35:05 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:35:04 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcxBebm+h5+eloKNT2qhKzDShF01pAAAIKVg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090209.4E1DC941.0059:SCFMA922111,ss=1,re=-4.000,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:36:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48897 Archived-At: > Stefan Monnier writes: > > >>> I prefer leaving things the way they are. > >> > >> And leave users without a clue? how's that preferable? > > > > Clearly, the only real answer is to get rid of > > blink-matching-paren-distance. We could try and do that, > > maybe using while-no-input. > > That would be a good long-term solution. > > Meanwhile, I've implemented Eli's suggestion of just altering the > message to add " within the limit" if we're limited. So I'm closing > this bug report. Stefan says what "clearly, the only real answer" is. He says that can be tried, and he makes a suggestion how. So why, if that is clearly the answer, do you close the bug? Makes no sense. Is the goal just to close bugs or to fix the problem? Is someone getting paid by the bug closure or something? ;-)