From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4543: window-full-height-p Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:41:57 +0200 Message-ID: <4ABE1A25.7050909@gmx.at> References: <4ABB19F5.50908@gmx.at> <4ABC73DB.1060308@gmx.at> <83vdj7tlup.fsf@gnu.org> <4ABCBEC7.70901@gmx.at> <4ABDE2C5.2070808@gmx.at> <83vdj6rllk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: martin rudalics , 4543@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1253974047 6985 80.91.229.12 (26 Sep 2009 14:07:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 4543@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 26 16:07:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MrXvj-0000sq-1m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:07:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42231 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MrXvi-0000wy-Ca for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:07:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MrXvd-0000vY-NZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:07:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MrXvZ-0000sa-DU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:07:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33830 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MrXvZ-0000sX-5r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:07:09 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:50684) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MrXvY-0002zZ-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:07:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8QE755U015286; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 07:07:06 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8QDo4ZJ011929; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:50:04 -0700 Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:50:04 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: martin rudalics Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:50:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4543 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4543-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B4543.125397252710939 (code B ref 4543); Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:50:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4543) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 26 Sep 2009 13:42:07 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with SMTP id n8QDg4l4010783 for <4543@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:42:06 -0700 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2009 13:41:58 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-36-64.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.36.64]) [62.47.36.64] by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 26 Sep 2009 15:41:58 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18ub85kvYwu360YgWsUQXFiBb7eq7c0OuoF6qh6lZ EgRV+LrQz2L6un User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <83vdj6rllk.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.57 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:07:13 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:31532 Archived-At: > Why doesn't it make sense? The computed value of new_frame_total_cols > is used to enlarge only the frame's root window: > > if (new_frame_total_cols != FRAME_TOTAL_COLS (f)) > { > set_window_width (FRAME_ROOT_WINDOW (f), new_frame_total_cols, 2); > > And for the root window, FRAME_TOTAL_COLS is correct, I think. The > window configuration, however complex, does not affect the root > window, does it? With Emacs -Q I can evaluate (set-window-scroll-bars nil 0 nil) to remove the scroll bar from the *scratch* window keeping the window size unaltered. When I now evaluate (scroll-bar-mode -1) the width of the frame shrinks and with it the number of columns used for text in the *scratch* window. This doesn't make sense. >> I'm not sure, however, whether text-only terminals inherently rely >> on these calculations. So the question I essentially ask is whether >> the number of total columns of a frame's root-window invariantly >> equals the width of that frame over all possible terminals. > > I think it does, yes. In any case, the code in change_frame_size_1 > _is_ run on text-only terminals (or should I say for frames on > text-only terminals, since we have multi-tty now). Fine. I wasn't entirely sure about dos_set_window_size (&newheight, &newwidth); which IIUC does adjust the width value via *rows = ScreenRows (); so this eventually does get related back to the frame's root window. martin