From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4026: `characterp' undocumented optional arg 'ignore' Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:31:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4A78706C.1060601@gmx.at> References: <4A786578.7080503@gmx.at> Reply-To: martin rudalics , 4026@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249408027 13089 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2009 17:47:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 4026@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: MON KEY Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 04 19:46:59 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MYO6E-00075r-6z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:46:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51816 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MYO6D-0001d6-Cw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:46:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MYO69-0001cz-H5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:46:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MYO65-0001cj-Sh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:46:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36958 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MYO65-0001ce-MY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:46:49 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:33454) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MYO65-0005St-66 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:46:49 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n74HklWW000576; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:46:47 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n74He5hd032370; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:40:05 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: martin rudalics Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:40:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4026 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4026-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B4026.124940710331861 (code B ref 4026); Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:40:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4026) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 4 Aug 2009 17:31:43 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with SMTP id n74HVbMx031850 for <4026@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:31:39 -0700 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Aug 2009 17:31:31 -0000 Original-Received: from 88-117-42-252.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [88.117.42.252]) [88.117.42.252] by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 04 Aug 2009 19:31:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/ntNY3Lh3nKHcjBBGMxqH3RI94Fp3O9mfG04gqjB XeUk3xns9ZnrpM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.74 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:46:53 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:29859 Archived-At: >> below. I'd appreciate if people could help me point out other false >> positives. > > How would you like these to be formatted/pointed out. > What is most useful for you/your code? People would have to look at the functions/variables they are familar with and check whether my code flags the error correctly. If it does, the manual (or the definition) should be corrected. If it is flagged incorrectly, a simple note why it is correct should be sufficent for me to change my code appropriately. Obviously, anyone seriously interested should run my code because it can automatically display (in separate windows) the corresponding texinfo lines and the Elisp source. > What are your criterion for 'false positives'? Social feedback - and this goes for false negatives as well ;-) martin, who'd like that list get empty before the next release