From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1754: 23.0.60; tool-bar is shown with tool-bar-mode off Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:50:37 +0100 Message-ID: <495E29BD.7060909@gmx.at> References: <877i5f914m.fsf@cyd.mit.edu><006101c96bd0$387ac7b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87zlibtsna.fsf@cyd.mit.edu><008701c96c57$dc010a20$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com><495D5972.3070509@gnu.org> <009301c96c77$6eb12160$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <009401c96c81$af560140$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <495E010F.6080504@gnu.org> Reply-To: martin rudalics , 1754@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1230908721 7118 80.91.229.12 (2 Jan 2009 15:05:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Chong Yidong' To: Jason Rumney , 1754@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 02 16:06:30 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LIlaj-0004Zu-Le for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:05:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49786 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LIlZU-0007w1-Oh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LIlYn-0007fp-1k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:03:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LIlYi-0007dZ-L7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:03:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39253 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LIlYi-0007dU-1X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:03:32 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:44913) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LIlYg-00063Q-E0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:03:31 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n02F3Ma0010024; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 07:03:23 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n02F03bc008876; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 07:00:03 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: martin rudalics Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1754 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1754-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1754.12309078827379 (code B ref 1754); Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:00:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1754) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Jan 2009 14:51:22 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id n02EpIgl007373 for <1754@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 06:51:20 -0800 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Jan 2009 14:51:12 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-47-151.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.47.151]) [62.47.47.151] by mail.gmx.net (mp060) with SMTP; 02 Jan 2009 15:51:12 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+4s6ERP0O4HzLe0mP+ezap4ZVuwnx6nWzh/s2RU0 7vYFepgvsAn+Sw User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: <495E010F.6080504@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.79 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:03:34 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:23690 Archived-At: > I can see why you get that impression from the doc string of > pop-up-frame-alist. The second line is confusing - both in that the > mentioned buffers are not pop-up-frames by default, and that if > pop-up-frames is enabled, then there is no difference between the > mentioned buffers and any other buffer that displays in a pop-up frame. > > The doc string should just say that pop-up-frame-alist applies to > pop-up-frames, which should also be obvious from the name. Trying to > explain pop-up-frames there (which I assume is what the intention of the > second line is) just confuses things. I've just rewritten some doc-strings in frame.el. Please have a look. martin