From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ali Bahrami Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1191: How to contribute back changes for Emacs on Solaris Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:21:25 -0600 Message-ID: <490106F5.1090708@emvision.com> References: <48F80A14.7010502@emvision.com> <200810170622.m9H6Mipv013865@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <48F8BD05.5010102@emvision.com> <200810172352.m9HNqwSb016244@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <48FAA706.2050806@emvision.com> <200810202229.m9KMTIjS025889@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <49001D97.3000602@emvision.com> <200810231935.m9NJZjZZ010299@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <49010007.2000607@emvision.com> <200810232306.m9NN6ELs011000@mothra.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Ali Bahrami , 1191@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224805819 10632 80.91.229.12 (23 Oct 2008 23:50:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1191@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 24 01:51:20 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kt9xX-0007fr-58 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:51:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41471 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kt9wR-00007w-Jh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:50:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kt9wO-00007d-Ml for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:50:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kt9wM-00005L-6w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:50:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41084 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kt9wM-000059-1x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:50:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:56185) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kt9wL-0004FA-II for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9NNo1Ec027875; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:50:02 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m9NNU32f023092; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:30:03 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Ali Bahrami Original-Sender: Ali.Bahrami@Sun.COM Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1191 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1191-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1191.122480408821854 (code B ref 1191); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1191) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 23 Oct 2008 23:21:28 +0000 Original-Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com (brmea-mail-2.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9NNLPhT021848 for <1191@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:21:27 -0700 Original-Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m9NNLPN1022035 for <1191@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:21:25 GMT Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K9700G01SN88900@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from ali_gnu@emvision.com) for 1191@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:21:25 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: from [172.20.25.67] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K9700HF0SVPUP10@mail-amer.sun.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:21:25 -0600 (MDT) In-reply-to: <200810232306.m9NN6ELs011000@mothra.ics.uci.edu> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080922) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:50:08 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:21849 Archived-At: Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > Ali Bahrami writes: ... > > % ./config.guess > > i386-pc-solaris2.11 > > % CC='gcc -m64' ./config.guess > > amd64-solaris2.11 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > This does not look right, it needs to be a triplet, not a pair, so amd64-pc-solaris2.11 I found that interesting too, which is one reason I showed that output to Ben in our other discussion. I trust that he'll flag it if its wrong. However, emacs configure is happy with this, so perhaps it's really OK, I'll fix whatever is needed there. Isn't the idea of having a "vendor" for instruction sets rather dated? I surely don't care who made my CPU, only what ISA it supports and what OS is running. > But I'll wait until your config.guess changes are checked in. > It's actually quite surprising that config.guess did not support for > amd64/x86_64 on Solaris... amd64 support for Solaris came with Solaris 10 (2005), and most people build the default that they get, which is 32-bit, never thinking to dig deeper. I wanted a 64-bit emacs specifically to get around the buffer size limit. So, perhaps I really am the first to hit this. > > BTW, context or unified diffs are preferred here. Understood, and I have been sending context diffs until this last one. The bits that got missed made me think that perhaps it was the wrong thing. Sorry, I'll go back to doing that. - Ali