From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28403: 25.2; find-tag works, but xref-find-definitions Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:13:33 +0300 Message-ID: <48b2816b-6fa5-bb3e-14e3-fff85d4fbc14@yandex.ru> References: <201709092240.v89MeFUo014854@psr.com> <201709100250.v8A2o6nL015568@psr.com> <837ex6vd83.fsf@gnu.org> <83k216t0wp.fsf@gnu.org> <835dc374-4846-0cb6-9fd6-ddef93711a37@yandex.ru> <838thlthx9.fsf@gnu.org> <0464c886-bd32-7252-7820-50e00e7fa0c7@yandex.ru> <83poauobqv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505391250 14766 195.159.176.226 (14 Sep 2017 12:14:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:14:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/56.0 Cc: wbe@psr.com, 28403@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 14 14:14:05 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsT1w-0003fo-Ha for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 14:14:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47500 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsT23-00057y-5m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:14:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48079) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsT1x-00057m-FR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:14:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsT1u-0007xr-9z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsT1u-0007xG-6T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsT1t-0006gq-QR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:14:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28403 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28403-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28403.150539122325684 (code B ref 28403); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28403) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2017 12:13:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39861 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsT1b-0006gC-BM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:13:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:46653) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsT1a-0006g0-3p for 28403@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:13:42 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id m199so7516721lfe.3 for <28403@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 05:13:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DKInwvtjjZgCAqZVkfZ0UlChGDYkXZb/HQd/Eb51B48=; b=OxyBnAyq4U2furYfnZY7HIivkhbJCyJz4oKg55F5+gCSDoxGFaoLHn9/XhDq70qh5A 5Sy99QBQzfOt5+SKrVaVm6JCphKsgfY116LTcvJXwaSK8Wc4qxohEDP0fvqV801wFtzJ 3+Pkp/WXxIUjfX5mJWVLuD5/EXol6jF62WZvO/yVQkdB7pOimOyN/GMKidAPrE1sywrx nDQ/naiJvPMswymG8Ur0UhAcxWskKOGV55oX3U8aKqj+2ONRA9itXKsYNSxIsAc2Cfjm M2T2WrOyEcwCfhKXNlJ+wWHMu3cnOhCLIqJ1wAzlLQXK3c+hDEYYPCA32IGyTnF5jVnH VMfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DKInwvtjjZgCAqZVkfZ0UlChGDYkXZb/HQd/Eb51B48=; b=e5AkjCwHesyzn/u0liw796qMUt7d495J6v+daHD32azwGwW+k/ZkHlrM0veWToeE+2 /iYWzK2//NAa862ZHlksK5fxwbd/KC08CV6Mem2x+O278edzTuS4T95XkZM6w+7IBACa zLHRJrfYuemMH4EAT/x7ML2Vt/bFkbkjMD/FoOj37zkI73OzF8pmxFBCyeWSwOpcJgdL aFIVJTmpqsNTYqkbLTgjRhg4ZL9SHA9Tazhje9egNtyD0vtg5awpeYat0ytBc7DrJaso 7WFGwe+xGe9ji90aEP0TWN8/804/J6c0N295vUx9+vpq543YrgXdcaLR8uC2hofMOh7+ GqUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUh0teTKFO4cfge7OwSi5FMCTmXnRvLdloz6LsGTpy73cgFDjssT s8mBv+goSPa3rinshQI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBBrcIryNUfJ+WAl4tEEsUov2JAMsL+Z41h0Py0RSZdwEC9enb57/VuBh7fIvUVjkv1UqMEKg== X-Received: by 10.46.92.3 with SMTP id q3mr9173862ljb.41.1505391215927; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 05:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.174] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g41sm2833872ljg.94.2017.09.14.05.13.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 05:13:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83poauobqv.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136957 Archived-At: On 9/13/17 6:32 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Should it be a defcustom in etags.el, then? That's not far from what I >> suggested in the first place. > > That'd be okay, if the UI will be more friendly than letting the user > concoct a list of function symbols. I'd approve probably any patch that makes etags-xref-find-definitions-tag-order into a defcustom, or even creates a new option governing it. But maybe it's not necessary after all? I think we've addressed Winston's needs in different ways by now. Maybe the manual should advertise the necessity to call etags with --regexp in certain cases more prominently instead.