From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Emacs 22.3 Windows Draw/Redraw Issues Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 05:06:46 +0800 Message-ID: <48D41466.7020600@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1221858490 9758 80.91.229.12 (19 Sep 2008 21:08:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Ng, Andrew" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 19 23:09:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KgnDf-00042A-9D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:08:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48012 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KgnCd-0005AD-Ok for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:07:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KgnCY-00059l-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:07:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KgnCW-000599-70 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:07:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35043 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KgnCW-000596-28 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:07:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.189]:43321) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KgnCV-0004OT-Q8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:07:39 -0400 Original-Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so622446fkq.10 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:07:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=BCpO1PHoPonkcBFge4Gd6XZmXMtynl8ws5Lgmwhwhyo=; b=iLMCD+4W4n9oYG1pOh2EuFUBvD9UzWxOO5BC7Vn+xswUdCKgIhOb9HZeFQtJ2jNMZX VP+KPmeA8Lc56WdizTCLNXDCGrmNJzend2Mwf5HJNhLKxgjAj3jLRGefTiWx8HcU7t0k jK5pbf93KQbXacaiF+o7MATrFCVbRg27uUflQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :sender; b=XRWNJLIDdpr6jxb1KvydlJc5vHTXEjGv2AIBuOVx62+pToYrd6/dmnkKeZuWE8RcJ9 XRTsglQUiPkH/VeKRTuYIKX39bcJ0b4pSQA+DF8C5GAvYUl8hIbTXbUdLr5PkIBt8Lym oCKPbabP9XPIwjoulUoIrM7xWRp+cU1J8sqa8= Original-Received: by 10.181.21.6 with SMTP id y6mr584416bki.50.1221858457058; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?192.168.249.36? ( [83.67.23.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d2sm1593056nfc.20.2008.09.19.14.07.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:07:36 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103976 gmane.emacs.bugs:20663 Archived-At: Ng, Andrew wrote: > I have come across various draw/redraw problems with Emacs on Windows, > particular since ClearType support was enabled. These problems annoyed > me sufficiently that I decided to fix them myself. I have tried to get > these fixes submitted previously, but with no success thus far. > Hi Andrew, I did apply a minimum subset of the patches you submitted that was required to eliminate all bugs reported before the date I applied the patch. This was done at the last minute before 22.2 was released (thus the reason why I tried to reduce the impact of your changes), and since there were no reports after 22.2 was released, this was never revisited. The Emacs 22 branch is effectively dead with the release of 22.3 AFAIK, and the font handling in Emacs 23 is completely different, so if patches are still required, they are likely to be completely different.