From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#931: 23.0.60; Bug in bytecomp.el: displaying warnings Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:23:12 +0200 Message-ID: <48C79200.2000708@gmx.at> References: <1220902523.951243.11457@green> <48C59543.2020907@gmx.at> Reply-To: martin rudalics , 931@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1221040254 27084 80.91.229.12 (10 Sep 2008 09:50:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 931@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, michael_heerdegen@web.de To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 10 11:51:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KdMMW-0004xA-4Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:51:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51763 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KdMLW-0000Pl-3O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:50:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KdMIY-0007fZ-JL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:47:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KdMIT-0007di-DN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:47:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42606 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KdMIR-0007d8-7B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:51679) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KdMIQ-0006xP-UV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8A9lWq5030919; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:47:33 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m8A9Z38i026216; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:35:03 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: martin rudalics Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:35:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 931 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 931-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B931.122103891124296 (code B ref 931); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:35:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 931) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Sep 2008 09:28:31 +0000 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id m8A9SQAc024287 for <931@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:28:28 -0700 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2008 09:28:21 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-41-103.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.41.103]) [62.47.41.103] by mail.gmx.net (mp056) with SMTP; 10 Sep 2008 11:28:21 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18bPSc9WCgbDc72X+JOMI+uWO1LF6Jv9BUVshdUjM vCw/tgSAj/Ht/w User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.79 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:47:38 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20431 Archived-At: > I suppose the byte-compiler should either refrain from using > `display-warning' > > That would be very drastic and cause a lot of inconvenience > in the normal situation where there is no bug! I obviously meant use something different instead of `display-warning'. > or, if `pop-up-windows' and `pop-up-frames' are nil, > not display a warning until compilation is complete. > > The solution that occurs to me is that `display-warning' should > bind `pop-up-windows' to t in that case. This would (1) ignore a user preference and (2) not work when the window can't be split for some reason. martin