From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#940: Is there a way to quit loading of ~/.emacs please? Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:10:21 +0200 Message-ID: <48C6F44D.2050407@gmail.com> References: <48C685F3.60001@gmail.com> Reply-To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , 940@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220999283 10874 80.91.229.12 (9 Sep 2008 22:28:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 940@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Yiyi Hu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 10 00:28:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KdBhY-0005s4-9A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:28:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33019 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KdBgX-0007Hf-6Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:27:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KdBgS-0007H2-TS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KdBgR-0007Gk-5u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33106 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KdBgQ-0007Gh-Vf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:45883) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KdBgP-0008NE-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:27:38 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m89MRWXC019346; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 15:27:32 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m89MK2wE016295; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 15:20:02 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 940 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 940-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B940.122099823514055 (code B ref 940); Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 940) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Sep 2008 22:10:35 +0000 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m89MAVch014049 for <940@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 15:10:33 -0700 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-87.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.87]:60091 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KdBPq-0005WJ-6J; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:10:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080908-0, 2008-09-08), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.87 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KdBPq-0005WJ-6J. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KdBPq-0005WJ-6J 9979e31e6292d4190653389e5b820179 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:27:40 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20414 Archived-At: Yiyi Hu wrote: > Why not use 'unless' statement version? > (unless (byte-compile-file-if-newer "~/.emacs") > remaining lisp code ...) > Because, This will confuse M-x customize-* series functions. Just set custom-file to store customizations in another file. > Why not splitting ~/.emacs? > I did this, and It's not a happy journey. Eg, when change something, I > have to think wether I should put here or there, or within ~/.emacs. Not if you just put everything there. But the main question is: Why do you want to compile absolutely everything? I feel there must be some misunderstanding somewhere. How much time to you win? How many times do you start Emacs? I think most users just start Emacs one they boot their computer.