From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#890: Problem using `etc/emacs.bash' with EmacsW32 Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:20:27 +0200 Message-ID: <48C2F41B.1080106@gmx.at> References: <6bb3db200809050839l4e90bd50q80eefe4938144df5@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: martin rudalics , 890@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220737689 10099 80.91.229.12 (6 Sep 2008 21:48:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: find lulu To: Stefan Monnier , 890@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 06 23:49:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kc5eQ-000483-QF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:49:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57960 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kc5dR-0001j7-7o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:48:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kc5d3-0001YA-W4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kc5d1-0001Wk-ID for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44140 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kc5d1-0001Wf-CS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:33147) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kc5d0-0004eW-R0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m86LlVEG001002; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:47:32 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m86LU3Br026987; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:30:03 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: martin rudalics Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 890 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 890-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B890.122073617825005 (code B ref 890); Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 890) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 6 Sep 2008 21:22:58 +0000 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id m86LMrpn024999 for <890@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:22:55 -0700 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Sep 2008 21:22:47 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-54-15.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.54.15]) [62.47.54.15] by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 06 Sep 2008 23:22:47 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18Qsnob8sUQOm+llKJN4Ff4vU1wQuNuYWctouPGGM FADhoL3Wp4iMmI User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.83 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:36 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20256 Archived-At: > But for that, we need someone (e.g. you) to test the replacement. Since the original report is IMHO the most accurately written one to ever appear on this list, we should maybe ask its author to provide patches for the replacements he suggested ;-) martin