From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#865: 23.0.60; The directory is unsafe today Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:01:56 +0200 Message-ID: <48BDC5E4.4080205@gmail.com> References: <48BD642C.5050405@gmail.com> <48BD74D5.4050800@gnu.org> <48BD80C0.80707@gmail.com> <48BD8FA8.6030707@gmail.com> <48BDC0EE.1080104@gmail.com> Reply-To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220398490 10282 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2008 23:34:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 03 01:35:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KafPD-000845-Kd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:35:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55073 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KafOD-0002h8-L2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:34:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KafHh-0000QC-TQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KafHf-0000PA-KD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34136 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KafHf-0000Op-8X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:49660) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KafHe-0002l4-7n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m82NRU77014394; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:27:31 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m82NA5fh008233; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:10:05 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:10:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 865 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 865-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B865.12203965245335 (code B ref 865); Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:10:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 865) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Sep 2008 23:02:04 +0000 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m82N20YL005329 for <865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:02:01 -0700 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-87.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.87]:65329 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Kaesp-0000JV-6B; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:02:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080902-0, 2008-09-02), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.87 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Kaesp-0000JV-6B. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1Kaesp-0000JV-6B a1a622358ef2fa08019a00523dd15ba7 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:27:40 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20050 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 00:40, Lennart Borgman (gmail) > wrote: > >> Forgot that discussion. Yes, but why not check the error returned instead? > > Check for what? Hm, I see that you can just get the rather general `file-error' error. Maybe it is better to just test if the file really was deleted then. The reason I want to test this is that errors in these parts often are confusing and hard to find. There could be something that prevents the file from beeing deleted.