From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57152: 29.0.50; Emacs executable isn't rebuilt when loaddefs.el is modified Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 11:24:36 +0200 Message-ID: <48845bf9-f24b-a2f8-9940-833cbc000354@gmail.com> References: <83k07endtb.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgg9o5nx.fsf@gnus.org> <8335e1o4yg.fsf@gnu.org> <878rnsl683.fsf@gnus.org> <87a685akh8.fsf@gnus.org> <838rnpiur4.fsf@gnu.org> <877d37kva7.fsf@gnus.org> <87fshthg74.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5185"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Andrea Corallo , 57152@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 19 11:27:47 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oOyI6-0001Cz-VW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 11:27:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53880 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOyI5-0003bg-Dg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 05:27:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOyFS-0002sB-Pv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 05:25:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39409) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOyFS-0003sK-8l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 05:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOyFR-0006MO-Mw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 05:25:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57152 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57152-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57152.166090109324429 (code B ref 57152); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57152) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2022 09:24:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOyFG-0006Lv-G1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 05:24:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com ([209.85.208.51]:42501) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOyFB-0006Lf-4F for 57152@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 05:24:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id z20so4908288edb.9 for <57152@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 02:24:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc; bh=JGSFJWeLOIr9YjxuFyi+Zngfo0lpesoKikinSU71A9c=; b=OrCb3e6tkhk70qOY6hIAcFQaAmYwpQeXMXmrqfeAptsH6sslH97IFMYZS9aIETDjYK YMKccNTgRRhmApPxpKIkw61ht0KsLG4lT2ML5C4RxarsCzi/CeXxiUFNP5Yng15LOwJ8 7eiwEJpkloqQG6D8319KKDSNVCESV8FoxNUeSHkups4Sa6F45ET+N+rtWYsR6GBmg+SL ytuFQz2hJhmaN97RPDPKZmA/cffNxZhMQaiylj2MBPuolDgBaublwjhZkcpBR3W0lR3c 1Rx9LXop++1d1d60Hs1Tx6ZCN3KqoJDDNFGoqg4ODUvniivs/eA2VBK2So7jAnOAnhNK nxFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=JGSFJWeLOIr9YjxuFyi+Zngfo0lpesoKikinSU71A9c=; b=MZYvUqQX3Ef0rsvfGgxaHL1vEVPAMCUVjDkQjTm/+MwCer9MjbWHyroVFLJTm/w3JJ 8WxO+9hCP+7zvv03DSF5HE8CxQCyMSQenuxlzjkbcA8GmgaFxrRqiS3Ebq6aXvTUd3ID oHtj/XhtC4RYSM0UzYwC8+yKgeV7Vxhu4w7RJHmf+Pgd6S4HkpGdraXD4AOvecaCiKuT F+P+GjAzrxi5FrnhsWHQKI6LpM9f393CgxC/G2Hz+VUGdNdTTStk+FD8+dK2ZI7fqPhq PawCUsKAhbHhua+1EMVQ9e4L6d3NDsePqczXAI5/WgErC7Sk7mVTtzs4EAuuhvrmqS19 pd6g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1+dnA1+x9mjirxQYpB6u7v2BIUWQYwxnKYF/rmydQfzVRKCr1x n+wwXzwkLG/+DJsvs0cnu6o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5IFRuTaeCUhOov+98MlB101mMK9bGHTcxWgrvACHs+72gPS7EDKHE+HZk6p5Bq+Em2enGaLw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2751:b0:443:d90a:43d4 with SMTP id z17-20020a056402275100b00443d90a43d4mr5513940edd.368.1660901079159; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 02:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.178.21] (pd9e36a1e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.227.106.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c14-20020aa7c98e000000b0043bea0a48d0sm2720535edt.22.2022.08.19.02.24.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 02:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87fshthg74.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:240198 Archived-At: On 22-08-18 14:46 , Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > So I just went ahead and pushed it. :-) Oh no :-). > There is one pretty strange thing though, which I can't explain. I once >> got an error "trying to load incoherent eln" which is mentioned in >> bug#45103. I can't say much else about this though, not even what the >> cause of this might be. It was a build with -j8 if that matters. Maybe >> elns are modified during dumping, so that a second dump cannot be done? >> But that wouldn't explain why it succeeds most of the time. No idea, >> and not easily reproducible, alas. > Yes, I've seen those, too, but very seldom (like -- once a month?), and > I haven't been able to reproduce it. If anyone reading this has any idea, be it just a gut feeling or something, how to reproduce this failure, even if not 100% reliable, I'd be grateful to hear it.