From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#374: Info header line does not respect mouse-1-click-follows-link Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:44:36 +0200 Message-ID: <48540384.6090107@gmail.com> References: <000801c8c832$81861ff0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com><00b501c8cdf5$d5b8d180$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <00bc01c8ce3c$f3079860$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <4853F9A4.3040309@gmail.com> <00c401c8ce41$700a04c0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <4853FC71.9060804@gmail.com> <00c601c8ce44$eb150360$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , 374@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213466873 25777 80.91.229.12 (14 Jun 2008 18:07:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 374@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 14 20:08:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K7aB0-0005om-Ed for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:08:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38223 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K7aAC-00032t-Hm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K7a9k-0002k7-DN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K7a9i-0002hm-7Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:07:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37294 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K7a9i-0002hN-1j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:07:14 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:45005) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K7a9h-0005Rb-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:07:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m5EI78Gi010429; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:07:11 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m5EHo5K3005202; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:50:05 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:50:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 374 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 374-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B374.12134655003809 (code B ref 374); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:50:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 374) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 14 Jun 2008 17:45:00 +0000 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m5EHiuW9003803 for <374@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:44:58 -0700 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-59.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.59]:62243 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1K7Zo8-0006c7-3b; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:44:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <00c601c8ce44$eb150360$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080614-1, 2008-06-14), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.145.59 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1K7Zo8-0006c7-3b. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1K7Zo8-0006c7-3b 94ba9142929f6c1da95e2b6d5582940f X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:07:15 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:18393 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: >>> The point here is about users being _able_ to have the traditional >>> (pre-22)behavior, not about setting the traditional >>> behavior as the default. >> Wouldn't that need be much less if the links where underlined or only >> underlined links where followed by mouse-1 (as I wrote in the >> previous comment to your proposal)? > It has nothing to do with link appearance. (It would not help to underline links > in Dired.) Quite the contrary: I don't want to have to look carefully to see if > I'm clicking on a link, just to select a buffer. I don't want to check whether > text is underlined or whatever. Thanks, I see. But I believe many people would think differently since they have learned otherwise from for example web browsers. But with that I do not want to say I am against your proposal for an option. Personally I do not mind.