From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10069: colour -> color spelling change Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:35:10 -0800 Message-ID: <4850B61FB247420894851CD45167C6D2@us.oracle.com> References: <4EC4BA14.2010906@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321540595 19789 80.91.229.12 (17 Nov 2011 14:36:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10069@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Glenn Morris'" , "'Paul Eggert'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 17 15:36:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RR34o-0002qf-Nq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:36:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45241 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RR34o-00075T-9a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:36:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39866) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RR34W-0006OL-Sz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:36:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RR34V-00041d-5s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:36:12 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RR34V-00041Z-4N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:36:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RR35K-0003Px-2l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10069 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 10069-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10069.132154058313081 (code B ref 10069); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10069) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2011 14:36:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RR34g-0003Ow-Q5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:36:23 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RR34d-0003Oi-U3 for 10069@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:36:20 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id pAHEZKHJ021750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:35:21 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAHEZJbX019420 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:35:20 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt112.oracle.com (abhmt112.oracle.com [141.146.116.64]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id pAHEZEmV015372; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:35:14 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.34.104) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:35:13 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Acyk/W2jJcI7UVyYQX20h1Jeuz0JAQAOF6BQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A020203.4EC51BA9.01AD,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:37:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54024 Archived-At: > > -;; Keywords: colour, rgb > > +;; Keywords: color, colour, rgb > > The Keywords header was badly named. It's supposed to contain keywords > recognized by finder.el. But it just gets filled with any old thing > people think might be relevant. None of these 3 are in > finder-known-keywords. Is it supposed to contain _only_ keywords recognized by finder.el? If so, where is that documented? (I wasn't aware of it.) Why would we want to limit the use of this human-readable field to what finder.el can make use of?