* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' @ 2013-06-18 21:26 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-01 17:37 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2019-11-01 21:11 ` Drew Adams 0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Drew Adams @ 2013-06-18 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 14659 Not sure there is a bug here, but I think so. (x-list-fonts "*") returns a list containing this XLFD font name (and two other names that are similar): "-outline-DFKai-SB-normal-normal-normal-script-*-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1". That is not a valid XFLD name (e.g., it contains 15, not 14, hyphens). And this error is raised by `modify-frame-parameters': Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Font `-outline-DFKai-SB-normal-normal-normal-script-*-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1' is not defined") modify-frame-parameters(#<frame throw-i-font.el 06b50270> ((font . "-outline-DFKai-SB-normal-normal-normal-script-*-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1"))) Should `xs-list-fonts' return only valid XFLD font names? Or is the current behavior correct on all counts? Note that I can use this font otherwise. E.g., in emacs -Q I can S-mouse-1, `Change Buffer Font', choose `DFKai-SB', and the font is used OK. That uses `x-select-font'. So perhaps the bug is with `modify-frame-parameters' (?). In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32) of 2013-06-17 on ODIEONE Bzr revision: 113024 eliz@gnu.org-20130617163040-8hmzci370q4argze Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --prefix=/c/Devel/emacs/binary --enable-checking=yes,glyphs CFLAGS=-O0 -g3 LDFLAGS=-Lc:/Devel/emacs/lib CPPFLAGS=-Ic:/Devel/emacs/include' ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2013-06-18 21:26 ` bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 17:37 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2019-11-01 18:04 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-01 18:22 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-01 21:11 ` Drew Adams 1 sibling, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-11-01 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Drew Adams; +Cc: 14659 Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes: > Not sure there is a bug here, but I think so. > > (x-list-fonts "*") returns a list containing this XLFD font name > (and two other names that are similar): > "-outline-DFKai-SB-normal-normal-normal-script-*-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1". > > That is not a valid XFLD name (e.g., it contains 15, not 14, hyphens). I tried this on this Debian laptop: (loop for font in (x-list-fonts "*") unless (= (loop for char across font when (= char ?-) sum 1) 14) do (insert font "\n")) and there were no fonts returned by the function that's invalid in this way. I don't know whether that's because I just don't have any such font, or whether x-list-fonts has been fixed not to return these invalid font strings. Are you still seeing this? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 17:37 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-11-01 18:04 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-02 14:38 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2019-11-01 18:22 ` Drew Adams 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 14659 > Are you still seeing this? No, but I no longer have that font installed. I no longer have the same laptop etc... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 18:04 ` Drew Adams @ 2019-11-02 14:38 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-11-02 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Drew Adams; +Cc: 14659 Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes: >> Are you still seeing this? > > No, but I no longer have that font installed. > I no longer have the same laptop etc... OK, then it seems unlikely that we'll make further progress here, and I'm closing this bug report. Please reopen if you see this again. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 17:37 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2019-11-01 18:04 ` Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 18:22 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-01 19:09 ` Eli Zaretskii 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 14659 BTW, this and other bug mails from you today is missing the bug number from the Subject line. The bug number was present in the cc to 14659@debbugs.gnu.org, so my Reply All resulted in the reply going to that cc address, so I received a copy of my reply with the bug #. But the message from you that I replied to had only this as Subject: RE: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' That makes it very hard (~impossible) to search or sort by Subject line in my mail client (Outlook). Could you please make sure that the bug number remains in the Subject line when you reply? For some reason, I saw this for multiple bug mails from you today, but not from others. I don't think I've seen it before. Thx. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 18:22 ` Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 19:09 ` Eli Zaretskii 0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2019-11-01 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Drew Adams; +Cc: larsi, 14659 > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 11:22:02 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> > Cc: 14659@debbugs.gnu.org > > BTW, this and other bug mails from you today is missing the bug number from the Subject line. They are not missing here. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2013-06-18 21:26 ` bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' Drew Adams 2019-11-01 17:37 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-11-01 21:11 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-01 21:25 ` Eli Zaretskii 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eli Zaretskii, Drew Adams; +Cc: larsi, 14659 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 684 bytes --] > And other bug mails are not missing the bug number > from the Subject line. > > And even Lars's mails from other days were not > missing bug numbers from the Subject line. Maybe > it's only these few bugs; dunno. I take it back that no other bug mails show the problem. Just got the attached mail from Stefan K., which shows the same problem - no bug # in Subject field. I haven't changed anything on my end. And this problem is new. Previously, the Subject line always appeared as does this one now: with bug#...: followed by the release number - not just starting with the release number (no bug #): RE: bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters'... [-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1371 bytes --] From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> To: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> Cc: 11314@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: 24.1.50; Regression: incorrect Lisp indentation for `if' with `@@@@@@' Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 12:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <87imo3xt9o.fsf@marxist.se> found 11314 27.0.50 thanks "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes: > emacs -Q > > Type this into an Emacs Lisp buffer: > > (if (alpha beta) C-j aaaaaa C-j bbbbbb > > You get this: > > (if (alpha beta) > aaaaaa > bbbbbb > > That is correct. bbbbbb is indented correctly. > > Now do the same thing, using @@@@@@ instead of aaaaaa. This is the > result - bbbbbb is indented incorrectly. > > (if (alpha beta) > @@@@@@ > bbbbbb > > Yet @@@@@@ is a perfectly good symbol/variable name etc. > > This regression was introduced in Emacs 22. I can reproduce this on current master. Best regards, Stefan Kangas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 21:11 ` Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 21:25 ` Eli Zaretskii 0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2019-11-01 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Drew Adams; +Cc: larsi, 14659 > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 14:11:07 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 14659@debbugs.gnu.org > > I take it back that no other bug mails show the > problem. Just got the attached mail from Stefan K., > which shows the same problem - no bug # in Subject > field. FWIW, I do see the bug number in Subject of that message. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' [not found] ` <<83eeyrl8h0.fsf@gnu.org> 2013-06-18 21:26 ` bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 21:02 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-03 3:24 ` Richard Stallman 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eli Zaretskii, Drew Adams; +Cc: larsi, 14659 > > BTW, this and other bug mails from you today is missing the bug > > number from the Subject line. > > They are not missing here. They are missing here. My mail client is Outlook. And other bug mails are not missing the bug number from the Subject line. And even Lars's mails from other days were not missing bug numbers from the Subject line. Maybe it's only these few bugs; dunno. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 21:02 ` Drew Adams @ 2019-11-03 3:24 ` Richard Stallman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Richard Stallman @ 2019-11-03 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Drew Adams; +Cc: larsi, 14659 [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > > BTW, this and other bug mails from you today is missing the bug > > > number from the Subject line. The FSF sysadmins said during the week that they had changed how RT lists forward mail. I did not follow the details, but this may be a consequence of that. -- Dr Richard Stallman Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <<<afadb85f-976f-45c0-9c06-6471a95c4c80@default>]
[parent not found: <<<87eeyrwl9t.fsf@gnus.org>]
[parent not found: <<<fa4a2a19-2888-418d-918c-254721679808@default>]
[parent not found: <<<83eeyrl8h0.fsf@gnu.org>]
[parent not found: <<f89b06c1-e96f-4eea-af6b-f1355a9af803@default>]
[parent not found: <<83y2wzjnm5.fsf@gnu.org>]
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' [not found] ` <<83y2wzjnm5.fsf@gnu.org> @ 2019-11-01 21:34 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-01 22:16 ` Stefan Kangas 2019-11-02 7:01 ` Eli Zaretskii 0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eli Zaretskii, Drew Adams; +Cc: larsi, 14659 > > I take it back that no other bug mails show the > > problem. Just got the attached mail from Stefan K., > > which shows the same problem - no bug # in Subject > > field. > > FWIW, I do see the bug number in Subject of that message. Interesting. I assume you mean the message that I included as an attachment. Odd that I don't see the bug number there. What's more, if I open that message in its own (Outlook) window and use "File > Properties", the field "Internet headers" is completely empty. Normally that field shows the full email header. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 21:34 ` Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 22:16 ` Stefan Kangas 2019-11-01 22:23 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-02 7:01 ` Eli Zaretskii 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Stefan Kangas @ 2019-11-01 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Drew Adams; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, 14659 Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes: > > > I take it back that no other bug mails show the > > > problem. Just got the attached mail from Stefan K., > > > which shows the same problem - no bug # in Subject > > > field. > > > > FWIW, I do see the bug number in Subject of that message. > > Interesting. I assume you mean the message that I > included as an attachment. Odd that I don't see the bug > number there. I don't see it in the subject line of the message you attached, but I do see it in the original message I sent. > What's more, if I open that message in its own (Outlook) > window and use "File > Properties", the field "Internet > headers" is completely empty. Normally that field shows > the full email header. I can see the headers just fine, here. Best regards, Stefan Kangas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 22:16 ` Stefan Kangas @ 2019-11-01 22:23 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-01 22:56 ` Stephen Berman 2019-11-01 23:05 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Kangas; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, 14659 > > > FWIW, I do see the bug number in Subject of that message. > > > > Interesting. I assume you mean the message that I > > included as an attachment. Odd that I don't see the bug > > number there. > > I don't see it in the subject line of the message you attached, but I > do see it in the original message I sent. Thanks for checking. Curiouser and curiouser. > > What's more, if I open that message in its own (Outlook) > > window and use "File > Properties", the field "Internet > > headers" is completely empty. Normally that field shows > > the full email header. > > I can see the headers just fine, here. And curiouser. (I guess you mean you can see them in Outlook, as I described. Or maybe you mean that you can see them in another way? In any case, you confirm that they are present, even if I can't see them.) (I have Outlook 2016, FWIW.) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 22:23 ` Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 22:56 ` Stephen Berman 2019-11-01 23:07 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-01 23:05 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Stephen Berman @ 2019-11-01 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Drew Adams; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, Stefan Kangas, 14659 On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 15:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote: >> > > FWIW, I do see the bug number in Subject of that message. >> > >> > Interesting. I assume you mean the message that I >> > included as an attachment. Odd that I don't see the bug >> > number there. >> >> I don't see it in the subject line of the message you attached, but I >> do see it in the original message I sent. > > Thanks for checking. > > Curiouser and curiouser. > >> > What's more, if I open that message in its own (Outlook) >> > window and use "File > Properties", the field "Internet >> > headers" is completely empty. Normally that field shows >> > the full email header. >> >> I can see the headers just fine, here. > > And curiouser. (I guess you mean you can see them > in Outlook, as I described. Or maybe you mean that > you can see them in another way? In any case, you > confirm that they are present, even if I can't see > them.) > > (I have Outlook 2016, FWIW.) As another datapoint, I also received an email from Stefan Kangas today with no bug number in the subject line: Subject: Re: 24.1.50; read-{buffer,file-name}-completion-ignore-case fails But in the gmane.emacs.bugs newsgroup it shows up with the bug number: Subject: bug#11339: 24.1.50; read-{buffer,file-name}-completion-ignore-case fails on non-ascii Previous bug report emails from Stefan K I have received do have the bug number. I read both my email and newsgroups with Gnus. Steve Berman ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 22:56 ` Stephen Berman @ 2019-11-01 23:07 ` Drew Adams 0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Berman; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, Stefan Kangas, 14659 > As another datapoint, I also received an email from Stefan Kangas today > with no bug number in the subject line: > > Subject: Re: 24.1.50; read-{buffer,file-name}-completion-ignore-case > fails > > But in the gmane.emacs.bugs newsgroup it shows up with the bug number: > > Subject: bug#11339: 24.1.50; > read-{buffer,file-name}-completion-ignore-case fails on non-ascii > > Previous bug report emails from Stefan K I have received do have the > bug > number. I read both my email and newsgroups with Gnus. Good to know. Thanks. Maybe something changed wrt debbugs recently? I got mails from both Lars and Stefan K with no bug # in the Subject today. IOW, not just one sender. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 22:23 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-01 22:56 ` Stephen Berman @ 2019-11-01 23:05 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 2019-11-01 23:12 ` Drew Adams 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-11-01 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Drew Adams; +Cc: Stefan Kangas, 14659 Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes: > Curiouser and curiouser. I think it's due to me changing https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3000;mboxmaint=yes;mboxstat=yes to https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?mboxstat=yes;bug=3000 in gnus-bug-group-download-format-alist. The former includes the bug numbers in the subject, and the latter doesn't. I think I'll change it back again. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 23:05 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-11-01 23:12 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-02 14:57 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Drew Adams @ 2019-11-01 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: Stefan Kangas, 14659 > I think it's due to me changing ... to ... > in gnus-bug-group-download-format-alist. The former includes the bug > numbers in the subject, and the latter doesn't. I think I'll change it > back again. Cool. Thanks for checking so promptly and trying that. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 23:12 ` Drew Adams @ 2019-11-02 14:57 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-11-02 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Drew Adams; +Cc: Stefan Kangas, 14659 Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes: >> I think it's due to me changing ... to ... >> in gnus-bug-group-download-format-alist. The former includes the bug >> numbers in the subject, and the latter doesn't. I think I'll change it >> back again. > > Cool. Thanks for checking so promptly and trying that. OK; changed back again now so the Subject lines should go back to the way they were (with bug#) from now on in my emails. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-01 21:34 ` Drew Adams 2019-11-01 22:16 ` Stefan Kangas @ 2019-11-02 7:01 ` Eli Zaretskii 2019-11-02 7:26 ` Stefan Kangas 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2019-11-02 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Drew Adams; +Cc: larsi, 14659 > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 14:34:59 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 14659@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > I take it back that no other bug mails show the > > > problem. Just got the attached mail from Stefan K., > > > which shows the same problem - no bug # in Subject > > > field. > > > > FWIW, I do see the bug number in Subject of that message. > > Interesting. I assume you mean the message that I > included as an attachment. No, I mean that same message that I received directly from the bug tracker. The copy you attached indeed didn't include the bug number. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-02 7:01 ` Eli Zaretskii @ 2019-11-02 7:26 ` Stefan Kangas 2019-11-02 8:42 ` Eli Zaretskii 0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Stefan Kangas @ 2019-11-02 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, 14659 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes: > > Interesting. I assume you mean the message that I > > included as an attachment. > > No, I mean that same message that I received directly from the bug > tracker. The copy you attached indeed didn't include the bug number. If I'm not mistaken, I believe what Lars said is correct -- the problem is that debbugs currently doesn't include the bug number in the subject line due to the recent change in gnus-bug-group-download-format-alist. When you're in "To:" or "Cc:", the subject line will therefore not include the bug number, which is what Drew is seeing. If you instead receive the same email only from the list, the bug number was added back automatically by the list software before it was distributed. Best regards, Stefan Kangas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' 2019-11-02 7:26 ` Stefan Kangas @ 2019-11-02 8:42 ` Eli Zaretskii 0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2019-11-02 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Kangas; +Cc: larsi, 14659 > From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 08:26:49 +0100 > Cc: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>, 14659@debbugs.gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes: > > > > Interesting. I assume you mean the message that I > > > included as an attachment. > > > > No, I mean that same message that I received directly from the bug > > tracker. The copy you attached indeed didn't include the bug number. > > If I'm not mistaken, I believe what Lars said is correct -- the > problem is that debbugs currently doesn't include the bug number in > the subject line due to the recent change in > gnus-bug-group-download-format-alist. When you're in "To:" or "Cc:", > the subject line will therefore not include the bug number, which is > what Drew is seeing. If you instead receive the same email only from > the list, the bug number was added back automatically by the list > software before it was distributed. I was just reporting my observations. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-03 3:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <<afadb85f-976f-45c0-9c06-6471a95c4c80@default>
[not found] ` <<87eeyrwl9t.fsf@gnus.org>
[not found] ` <<fa4a2a19-2888-418d-918c-254721679808@default>
[not found] ` <<83eeyrl8h0.fsf@gnu.org>
2013-06-18 21:26 ` bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts' Drew Adams
2019-11-01 17:37 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-11-01 18:04 ` Drew Adams
2019-11-02 14:38 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-11-01 18:22 ` Drew Adams
2019-11-01 19:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-11-01 21:11 ` Drew Adams
2019-11-01 21:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-11-01 21:02 ` Drew Adams
2019-11-03 3:24 ` Richard Stallman
[not found] <<<afadb85f-976f-45c0-9c06-6471a95c4c80@default>
[not found] ` <<<87eeyrwl9t.fsf@gnus.org>
[not found] ` <<<fa4a2a19-2888-418d-918c-254721679808@default>
[not found] ` <<<83eeyrl8h0.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <<f89b06c1-e96f-4eea-af6b-f1355a9af803@default>
[not found] ` <<83y2wzjnm5.fsf@gnu.org>
2019-11-01 21:34 ` Drew Adams
2019-11-01 22:16 ` Stefan Kangas
2019-11-01 22:23 ` Drew Adams
2019-11-01 22:56 ` Stephen Berman
2019-11-01 23:07 ` Drew Adams
2019-11-01 23:05 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-11-01 23:12 ` Drew Adams
2019-11-02 14:57 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-11-02 7:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-11-02 7:26 ` Stefan Kangas
2019-11-02 8:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).