From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8865: 24.0.50; `display-buffer' does not respect `pop-up-frames' Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:31:54 -0700 Message-ID: <475597D23B844C31AAD37F8F9782FCC4@us.oracle.com> References: <4DF7B1BB.6050704@gmx.at><4DF87A4F.60704@gmx.at><5F95025D0ABE4561A305F30293828F38@us.oracle.com><4DF8DD1E.8080004@gmx.at><68E985ED37824BE799A9C01162553E22@us.oracle.com><4DF8EF87.8080903@gmx.at><7923A876A42744A39EEC6AAB67362EAC@us.oracle.com><185D134A9D484823B6473FD6B358D248@us.oracle.com><134D56CC977B4CB289C6F019A73A5F2D@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308335615 9820 80.91.229.12 (17 Jun 2011 18:33:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:33:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8865@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Stefan Monnier'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 17 20:33:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXdrE-0000g9-En for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:33:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49766 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXdrD-0002ws-H3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:33:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXdqu-0002vg-0P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:33:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXdqq-0003lN-AR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:33:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36737) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXdqq-0003lA-1Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXdqo-0004Xd-Gx; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8865.130833553417397 (code B ref 8865); Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2011 18:32:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXdq2-0004WX-2M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:32:14 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXdpz-0004WL-H6 for 8865@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: from rtcsinet21.oracle.com (rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id p5HIW3cS023047 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:32:05 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by rtcsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5HIW2r8013779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:32:03 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt013.oracle.com (abhmt013.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p5HIVvrP001587; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:31:57 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/71.202.147.44) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:31:56 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcwtCpWeCtVmZZZCRGqfDjgT7ULzvwABFEQQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4DFB9DA6.000D:SCFSTAT5015188,ss=1,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:33:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47271 Archived-At: > > My question was about replacing such a test. The common > > denominator of the intentions behind using such tests is > > what all of those tests do (have in common): distinguish > > nil `pop-up-frames' from non-nil. Nothing more. > > If that's all you want to do, then "(if pop-up-frames" is (trivially) > the only answer. Well, yes, in Emacs 20-23. But if `pop-up-frames' is being deprecated then what is the _replacement_ for such a test, going forward?