From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40990: Improve message-mode and isearch icons Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 01:12:38 +0300 Message-ID: <45991686-81b4-a27d-6367-f01bbc20ab10@yandex.ru> References: <83ees4w562.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv0zvey3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="9249"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 Cc: 40990@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 02 00:13:25 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jUduP-0002JK-03 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 00:13:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41280 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUduN-00049d-P5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 18:13:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33174) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUdu3-00046r-O7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 18:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUdu3-0000IR-6m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 18:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUdu1-0000IL-S5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 18:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUdu1-0000Sn-Mv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 18:13:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 22:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40990 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40990-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40990.15883711681756 (code B ref 40990); Fri, 01 May 2020 22:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40990) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2020 22:12:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50870 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUdto-0000SG-FL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 18:12:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com ([209.85.221.41]:44635) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUdtn-0000S1-7a for 40990@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 18:12:47 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id d17so13278424wrg.11 for <40990@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 01 May 2020 15:12:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2IAl9AazgsxJz7lR3I4oaP7FdTjjALibQ0x+vV6hhjQ=; b=f3jM18TKFBwdoGOKUUMTIuoaHhwyCHjM+jcLY80CLzkFLyz0oPIRrlwU9QByqRi0Zg 8NYoDNWFX3r6WNNvBc0tW87siUHhm9NGQtrXEa1+fgTBOICeMFBLV6+1mzoHjyTazRpU JVp4TahmuAwmo5oJlrdJ8S4GIIhsSVmArAGj5W54VnirG/cCWTnma9OGQ3ygrfXVmxZQ +EbMR/ZqVB/TeOoYOmvV2lZNnM9JJgcRfTF7TW1B9jzLvf4gBH6tcHKgpT50jFumYOpv psNP8CfiqDfH5Z503GZCK6a5sMbPF6XF993lPrJpXBlEVyoyiGPbxJn2zvsV5vJ989aW qYqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2IAl9AazgsxJz7lR3I4oaP7FdTjjALibQ0x+vV6hhjQ=; b=d5slU1vkGwm9lumEqlnqPVYFXDZlG6cdFE4PhA+r0ilR/C29NGCyg0ZsoGls9BlNSq uUsDt42kV3Wgg2stflC1sF0d3CtaWmId25s8amLIQ4ili5mUK0KFHwO+XMsAMaUh663g ALQV+PRzSxFC057Gnw51a0OQZcIQ3qelaVrIUpxPtGLs9xk5Ar9XtY9NRwG13Xufv1fc Tts97t8FMEptUrK9ZdKRz+qNcR0f+diYQEOoA/imzPZ6cr83YpgR+ozAFYOG98yBD/7o DCp3QYyI7vgYJIsxed/zhRxBaFb36o7igJ4VNYEl0xaJR87RWU4imny0ymnQqUQE7vEq HrVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaJB0cQh0bbER6YnbpiScRdQJSjYbPVl0XVNgnezC7Px8nHwcJa PLlJa5k3+4oMgayvnYaoG/y0Iqis63c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKgHpnt+ivMSjGRomRj42Co4lzon+E7xG8+gjEINajvbslVOhWMRIwPQwNjCzL8lBRZG4fWAA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6851:: with SMTP id o17mr6013047wrw.267.1588371161118; Fri, 01 May 2020 15:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s11sm6224615wrp.79.2020.05.01.15.12.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 May 2020 15:12:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83tv0zvey3.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179468 Archived-At: On 01.05.2020 18:43, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > We had this UI since v23, I think. I don't think anything bad will > happen if we have it for another year or 2. And of course people who > track the master branch will have it immediately. People who track master are not the audience I was thinking of, though. But okay, let's target Emacs 28 to be the "new UI polish" release. It would be nice to backport these patches to 27.2 if/when if comes out, though. > You do, but I'm asking to help me more. We should have released 27.1 > a year ago. I really hope that none of my late patches were ever the reason for the delay. Come to think of it, I don't recall any of my proposals like that to cause a release-delaying regression later, in the last... many years. And not just my proposals. We're pretty conservative about it. Which is a good thing, of course, but it indicates that we could be moving faster, even if just a bit (be it in allowing more last-minute fixes, or more feature backports, or doing shorter pretests, or starting pretests faster, or all of that together). >> Anyway, such discussions should become rare if we somehow manage to >> speed up the release cycle someday. > Such a someone will be very welcome, indeed. Someone? Anyway, for all I know, we could release 27 tomorrow. As soon as we deal with the "modify literal objects" documentation discussion.