From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:56:23 +0100 Message-ID: <4391448A-C7AF-4D7F-8866-C0313956D52D@gmail.com> References: <86zfv6uqjn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.15\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12535"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 69709@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 10 15:58:56 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rjKda-0002xp-9m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:58:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjKdE-0002EY-4n; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:58:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjKdB-0002E8-Oo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:58:29 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjKdB-0003BT-GD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:58:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rjKdi-0003Zl-Hv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69709 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69709-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69709.171008269013678 (code B ref 69709); Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69709) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2024 14:58:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rjKcp-0003YW-0I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:58:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com ([209.85.167.48]:59780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rjKcl-0003Xy-Rd for 69709@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:58:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-513a08f2263so767505e87.3 for <69709@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 07:57:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710082584; x=1710687384; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pzGAFai88D1fXW4Ir1VEyaeM9OhE/3MX7v4mj3GAdcI=; b=YRNZQ4JFM5ik4pSlatGE/7pWfKoN/j9ZkcdTqHYvuSuFTIQABWssBc2O5bQpbfpK04 qruG9R1277lg9tiznexbtz4vreb7q5nt7CZUr4X61kSqVZSC9YVhh8XGhzVwzFV82cuR KtxQsYWRs8gY6dD7aGnFp28lQ98GBT2QNtw9sxxkPAgjGRbocpZzOmKkB5mKsjnlEzJE 87veVUP5fGWq/vlCflKFDtu7bHab42E1XzddjX+a7BNiyphovNmUdjvjbMKgfGrd4gff S0fZttyynn85Wzufp3ZW0/LsrDILRtTj5bN5rSz4NyPTrTMc1eXKQ4kQwOCEVB2Jpwdg hP5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710082584; x=1710687384; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pzGAFai88D1fXW4Ir1VEyaeM9OhE/3MX7v4mj3GAdcI=; b=seGY5M9Mch0IfOVsTbsH8oVU+cOIiRpsLdadDMXUTDVKBZcg623emi4dPo9s9zAjKX aBoY1hNfMD9bM3pCTg2ja6tae1gqJLxVcpqy2DLGdJFyj5/aw/VybYOQDgauBj0CEwTg dqsKuZ5FpQWIj+Pbcl8faB/NdRIxLPDE+faUfMNLuTnhTnlLnKKtikSQEiCoJvpj+oYT xFm8RPqQrOm1xPG1VXIRrCa3pNkXqp/N3qzwjSp0Pa9g4rWYMyePlYQm5n9uPz58Mnst NdED4hbvKyNjovo+5jzrRcd+nJTyGEaKxuT6sWbeUCF0yQ9urZhQx1AoaEH1jTSW4rSk p10A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWcbpDggLk4ePMwu2K1YzLziAAeDVCOYDdy3HYJ44e0CjIH6W4NyAy0Z1MlErBbAMJF3jWOkWoRr8vC7fucmLg+mPKve9M= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy2edOPjCzFIjz+jmcVWrdgydJt2kSs87gbc2s/bCCC6HXpSP9u eloX7JcgxcIwZjymEt4AJSszYpPQ3xUfjsOQu/W1Z8frWWPRkXwG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHV7gsPPe1XmZT7qR0Vb4XzlfoOJDmueYhxo5D0Dido/VbjYBrClmykm8b0fCcOwX8TSGo84w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:360a:b0:512:bb33:2eab with SMTP id f10-20020a056512360a00b00512bb332eabmr2333210lfs.58.1710082584312; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 07:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple (c80-217-1-132.bredband.tele2.se. [80.217.1.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p28-20020a056512313c00b005131c6f2eb5sm685458lfd.114.2024.03.10.07.56.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Mar 2024 07:56:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86zfv6uqjn.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.15) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:281400 Archived-At: 10 mars 2024 kl. 15.09 skrev Eli Zaretskii : > A nit: let's go with a name that doesn't have "new" as part of it. Sorry, that was meant as a placeholder. I should have used a more = obvious non-name. > Do you intend to present an implementation that replaces sort-on as > well? Yes, `sort-on` would be completely subsumed by the new interface. > And what about performance? Existing code should see little or no change. Users of the new interface = would probably see performance improvements. You should trust me on = neither of these points until there is actual code. However the performance of the universal predicate seems fine, and is = definitely better than hand-writing a predicate in Lisp when applicable.