From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58538: anti-alias fix results in ugly scaled fonts Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:50:41 +0000 Message-ID: <43562d4dd9074dbd9f72@heytings.org> References: <539369.1665806843@pental> <1465497.1675229673@pental> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25450"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 58538-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stephen Gildea Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 14:51:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDWA-0006N1-Vm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:51:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDVv-0003Pk-E0; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 08:51:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDVu-0003PV-89 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 08:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDVt-00022M-W2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 08:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDVt-0006oi-Ol for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 08:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58538 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 58538-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D58538.167525944626179 (code D ref 58538); Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58538-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2023 13:50:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56874 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDVd-0006oB-TD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 08:50:46 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:39110) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDVb-0006o2-9w for 58538-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 08:50:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1675259442; bh=uJo918RWavRWfqWLEBR4UmIzgZBEBSQJLf7miCiI8UM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=5oLjBtH3a7uuMQ0HcpZac4sImZ5LrhAUpPSKUzAdoWineogMjGdylCknM+iCu+Bp6 wrAr26s7X5rk0W13gcVilkzthRGtd/aMzGkCJ2WGlotIlzip9fvFJM3xRhy8eYwcQc fSw9+nWOEAKC908CvHd8s//1eQiS8039b5y7GMqGCW4PefDqZ9SaK2xA+3dgS9F8nC 7eTg3OSbT5U9F3m7FWojd98+bPF4nFIEUMrd0q5tqGcOlsXwJpFAKbikMKAQ3cGsAw hbbjdNAvC3JUTIbKnr44x5E1DQHRj2LVLG7CVy0ZIQ6I0Dpx3/C0B7LZwKMSBHFWDn 4Bt2BErpmxBTA== In-Reply-To: <1465497.1675229673@pental> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:254580 Archived-At: > > This bug was fixed 10 Dec 2022 by commit 30e3cb2135, "Unset the > weight/slant/width in the spec when realizing a font". > Sorry, please ignore my previous post, I've misread yours. You wrote that the bug is fixed, and closed it. Somehow I thought you were opening a new bug.