From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Sebastian Urban Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36357: Wrong Ghostscript program name on MS Win Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 21:10:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4291e1bb-c061-39bc-818a-7243544ec52b@gmail.com> References: <90d6e546-8058-1cb3-1d2c-da31f9af0edc@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="36813"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 To: 36357@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 13 21:11:23 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jO4UM-0009V2-P7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 21:11:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47916 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jO4UL-00009Q-Ae for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:11:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jO4U2-00009D-Tl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jO4U2-0008Ly-4s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49268) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jO4U2-0008Ls-1K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jO4U1-00071X-Sj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sebastian Urban Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 19:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36357 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36357-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36357.158680504226973 (code B ref 36357); Mon, 13 Apr 2020 19:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36357) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2020 19:10:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60814 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jO4Ti-00070z-5B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:10:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-f175.google.com ([209.85.208.175]:41143) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jO4Tg-00070l-IC for 36357@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:10:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-f175.google.com with SMTP id n17so9872598lji.8 for <36357@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:10:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:references:subject:in-reply-to:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=chEdpcLDPe5WI5jUFhF74gSG8WWj32jkod5DROGL6xw=; b=kJtL8mymLJYnWpk4xWk9AV+diWUaAWD4QTYO6E8VwJwghCLlYRhsKPG0aloL/ZfLCz L/6GDit53wTacTdcFxxM1MUkbTbtBZOcFO2ohVAyT0LZMWqDxHBbOWTe9sOBSaGcU8RP qmsEBiCaLf+8cpscMpkSFpSz9ikSZRA7RQsAi8OOcnOiVkGK3QVLUgIGKcTPgpvnbfVP DIxuDhk7O/iU8Gc5RsbwLzT7D5+GFm0a9S4v07sid0zb1VF4QT+M4yE1GwkNb7SUbDaF uFPtPlXsoAJOLYKm1ZMMr3SkJntKGxumMdjeFo+Bhf01aYgeRANKANvECC0Qu2jFolF/ Tb+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:references:subject:in-reply-to:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=chEdpcLDPe5WI5jUFhF74gSG8WWj32jkod5DROGL6xw=; b=WlwNMuJ0+L1AJJX1pzMuVHKaLHsjThWuFHMVYBBGwg4xj74OvazhK5R9GRadGuZO+Q 6eO69ciucR8xY5d3OvjbRl9CNATxZcETbayNCfisQAFGmS3+Myu9wVbSoKwfofES6E1d QaQOZlPjbEUHucRx3uGtrAYpvvzrExwGZioXxc3ZrTdc8A4c4O76NJIJhJ/Ay84IaD31 ALcatiPrrOfAV8QCrLSdK2Okx6UyISW4aFEWKuAUefqe9LKqmWuZNdsVl6s1lYYooBbO f0vQphBwyKf/tH/cjp9ycyrzEe68hwgolwlt1dBSAxUpYXKBYCaH4lS1ajGGcdhSL6OA +rQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaISsr7PI74dwmMp6O4P0M0Ptl1LxdIPPJ2/vyzxQDQj1ibOG8/ JNzoSYy5ys6W4ij56jg9udH8CWAQ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK1tqUSKtKVbXs5h2TGUpfYmNP6xbWtF6+hdIHaeoJOlTMmJ92pRqeaG/wmPhwx3ijZK7Q06w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1038:: with SMTP id w24mr4534655ljm.77.1586805034089; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] (ip-89-161-13-171.tel.tkb.net.pl. [89.161.13.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p23sm8586312lfc.95.2020.04.13.12.10.32 for <36357@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:10:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <90d6e546-8058-1cb3-1d2c-da31f9af0edc@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-GB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:178328 Archived-At: Alright, 25 days have passed, and decision (preferably deed) for this simple bug should be made. Meanwhile I read initial e-mail for this bug and I found a quote: > Or as S. Monnier wrote: "(...) the default could simply > (executable-find "gs") and (executable-find "gswin32c") and use > whichever was found (...)". Could this "executable-find" help in this case? If not, and the condition based on "system-configration" will cause more problems than it'll solve, then a simple change to "gswin64c" should still be better option than leaving "gswin32c". S. U.