From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48042: 26.3; Macros don't work with french-postfix input method Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 15:00:28 +0000 Message-ID: <425cd7715b6cc6dda9b5@heytings.org> References: <86pmyghqf1.fsf@upmc.fr> <425cd7715bc9fae8b39a@heytings.org> <831ra9zi4x.fsf@gnu.org> <425cd7715bda5353110e@heytings.org> <83y2chxvg4.fsf@gnu.org> <425cd7715b4c15a15813@heytings.org> <83v97lxu0f.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29027"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, harven@free.fr, 48042@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 14 17:01:48 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lhZJz-0007Oq-Ip for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 17:01:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35996 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhZJx-0006Y5-S0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:01:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhZJM-0006Va-3g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:01:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhZJG-0007cZ-7p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:01:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhZJG-0000Qt-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 15:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48042 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 48042-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48042.16210044341621 (code B ref 48042); Fri, 14 May 2021 15:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2021 15:00:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46787 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhZIn-0000Q5-Ve for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:00:34 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:50780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhZIk-0000Pv-Jv for 48042@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:00:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1621004429; bh=ge/g4waKbvgUTCHIMb7sW3+L24Ul1p9qUR78/oDr73s=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=RsnB5mukwEw1Kaq+YWw5AHzcTXlUcec83/klhS+sSQ8QhJUEN5hj6U+K1vAqHW2zi dwakgHQ7RTa3cYmDxRZ7AECVSkpZbnzDWShS+xwcBBXg+hZ5t7JstFbMzq9WNheBTg IvLSEWXzHr2vwb/a9hKAEC6sx2NkBZfOb3rz8nGxwal74RKisGne0aGxoGTAkeGwPt MWl+4+WxUC1OworHNReK9uhUAgKaQKJuCQupF+Thh3+F/56ydXWVzLTbBJyf9rQ09M uSag4NI4MKYBv+fiqzu80AgrSWOtKllV0xdaEx5vuy8lM8/4TcZW2x5+c+UoFCj7Rm 5RAQvlMORD1sQ== In-Reply-To: <83v97lxu0f.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206526 Archived-At: >> What do you expect me to do now? > > If you are asking how I'd like to proceed with this bug, then, as I > wrote in another message, I'd like us to have a full understanding of > why binding inhibit--record-char didn't work well enough in the case in > point. It did solve some of the problem we had before that change, but > didn't solve all of it -- why? > > Once we understand that, I think we will have a much better basis for > discussing the possible solutions. > Okay, I'll have a look.