From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mauro Aranda Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69941: 30.0.50; Faulty fontification of radio button widgets Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 09:53:58 -0300 Message-ID: <4103ee70-0f42-4f91-b00e-a47fe42e183b@gmail.com> References: <87h6gynx49.fsf@rub.de> <87o79c8n60.fsf@gmx.net> <87zfst4zuh.fsf@rub.de> <87v83h4y31.fsf@rub.de> <86zfsez5w3.fsf@gnu.org> <874jam9r2o.fsf@gmx.net> <86sexnd55q.fsf@gnu.org> <87le3fljk5.fsf@gmx.net> <864ja3d0h5.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyorldxf.fsf@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35872"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: 69941@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 09 13:55:53 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tVs4m-0009At-UJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 13:55:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVs4C-00046F-JE; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 07:55:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVs47-0003ze-AA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 07:55:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVs3y-0008NN-T7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 07:55:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Date:From:To:Subject; bh=8LZzDLW5U+NXG69qFmiVA6FX6ByovsZ2cXPzcZvkUQM=; b=WDENrwbK78kKA6gOqo9DFCuFB7HK2Enf6jpilVR448u217wQ6F86ycSXx2vjg4ez4LTZ13a6Q+ybRMov9DACZbvXyoZ3fLRaz5PhjuQDP+kZEpsre823m6K7pK0AyblZyTpRvuPZbFGafxLlIJrNPYJswFTZKzFSIkg6+Iegrf1OzeO66UzDC2qfd1pLo05bsfcwX943KODpb9IXMFgfeZy5y6z9hpeKGzYQ50fL0ITIHzoDRdyfbzAFS//Pp+lQ5lyNyOySZ7kkFMXcbTmmE4eNva/JdjeChAJi/t+piDCpc7H6JA3STflkTjmVyPzs4cyc5SSPBZQRwrcd31xfGg==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVs3y-00069H-GY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 07:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mauro Aranda Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 12:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69941 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 69941@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.173642726123537 (code B ref -1); Thu, 09 Jan 2025 12:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2025 12:54:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50770 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVs3J-00067Y-2T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 07:54:21 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:57586) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVs3H-00067I-9g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 07:54:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVs39-0003Zz-Sa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 07:54:12 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVs38-0008E7-ER for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 07:54:11 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tVs35-0007Wh-1n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 13:54:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87cyorldxf.fsf@gmx.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: 3 X-Spam_score: 0.3 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:298832 Archived-At: Stephen Berman writes: > On Sat, 08 Jun 2024 16:32:06 +0300 nobody wrote: > >>> From: Stephen Berman >>> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 69941@debbugs.gnu.org >>> Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 14:12:42 +0200 >>> >>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2024 14:50:57 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> >>> >> From: Stephen Berman >>> >> Cc: Stefan Monnier , 69941@debbugs.gnu.org >>> >> Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 11:30:23 +0200 >>> >> >>> >> On Sat, 25 May 2024 10:51:08 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Ping! Any further comments about this, or changes to install? >>> >> >>> >> I haven't been able to pursue Stefan's suggestions yet. For the use >>> >> case for which I made the patch, I find the results overall better than >>> >> without it. Nevertheless, text inserted in front of the first radio >>> >> button unintentionally getting fontified with widget-inactive face is a >>> >> clear bug, so I think the patch should not be installed; I hope I (or >>> >> someone else) can improve it. >>> > >>> > Stefan, any other comments? Should I close the bug? >>> >>> While my patch prevents the misfontification I reported in my OP, it >>> adds another source of misfontification and is therefore not suitable >>> for installing. So the original bug remains and I think this bug report >>> should not yet be closed. >> >> OK, but what shall we do instead? Is anyone working on this? > > I'm really unclear how to try and implement what Stefan suggested. > Perhaps Mauro or someone else more familiar with the widget code might > be able to do it or give me some guidance. > > Steve Berman I'll work on this bug.