From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50431: revert-buffer doesn't preserve read-onlyness Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 12:38:30 -0400 Message-ID: <3ny289k6bd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87mtopkj2a.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39351"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) Cc: 50431@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 06 18:39:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNHeG-0009z8-Nz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 18:39:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49778 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNHeF-0005CV-Lq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 12:39:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNHe9-0005C7-S1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 12:39:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42769) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNHe9-0007Tc-Ks for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 12:39:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNHe9-0000I4-Id for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 12:39:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 16:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50431 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50431-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50431.16309463201084 (code B ref 50431); Mon, 06 Sep 2021 16:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50431) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2021 16:38:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54315 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNHdo-0000HQ-Fz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 12:38:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55962) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNHdl-0000HB-Sy for 50431@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 12:38:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNHdf-00075R-Ux; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 12:38:32 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNHde-00011X-Lv; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 12:38:30 -0400 X-Spook: tempest Tamil Tigers SETA Brownout Guantanamo Exposure X-Ran: T-.6ba+!Mop;R#R9f~Y3a.Hrew\S*JBRu#c|nGqYArKviQiTM6RQ#evcufa~yy2)! X-Hue: brightwhite X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87mtopkj2a.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Mon, 06 Sep 2021 18:03:09 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213617 Archived-At: Juri Linkov wrote: > I don't know at what moment this regression occurred, > but now M-x revert-buffer in a read-only file buffer > doesn't keep it read-only. For me, it reverts it to whatever the permission bits on the file say. Which is IMO the correct behaviour for revert-buffer. Perhaps you are referring to a short-lived change from https://debbugs.gnu.org/35166#24 which was quickly reverted?