unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
To: Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmail.com>
Cc: 33034-done@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#33034: `unwind-protect' cleanup form is not executed if body dies in stack overflow
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 10:02:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f05af02-38e2-c03a-8449-bad3d1bb7670@cs.ucla.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG7BparyujS9CKTv54N-brS_KMu5H=XY3KjhQoS3nRD_rZ-L9A@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 648 bytes --]

Thanks for the bug report; I installed the attached to fix it. The problem with 
your test case was neither C stack overflow nor failure to unwind the Lisp 
stack: it was failure to restore the Lisp evaluation depth (which is a separate 
thing from the Lisp stack size).

By the way, why are there two different limits? That slows the interpreter down 
a bit.  Why don't we simply have a limit for the Lisp stack size? Every time 
lisp_eval_depth grows, the stack size grows, so limiting the stack limits the 
evaluation depth for free. If we had done things this way, the interpreter would 
be a bit faster and this bug would never have occurred.

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Fix-lisp_eval_depth-in-unwind-protect-cleanup.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1804 bytes --]

From 5dfbdff57be6e93efe79f9b07e8b6383ec02959a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 09:51:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix lisp_eval_depth in unwind-protect cleanup

Problem reported by Paul Pogonyshev (Bug#33034).
* src/lisp.h (union specbinding): New member unwind.eval_depth.
* src/eval.c (record_unwind_protect, set_unwind_protect): Set it.
(do_one_unbind): Use it.
---
 src/eval.c | 3 +++
 src/lisp.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/eval.c b/src/eval.c
index 42c275de6b..a51d0c9083 100644
--- a/src/eval.c
+++ b/src/eval.c
@@ -3429,6 +3429,7 @@ record_unwind_protect (void (*function) (Lisp_Object), Lisp_Object arg)
   specpdl_ptr->unwind.kind = SPECPDL_UNWIND;
   specpdl_ptr->unwind.func = function;
   specpdl_ptr->unwind.arg = arg;
+  specpdl_ptr->unwind.eval_depth = lisp_eval_depth;
   grow_specpdl ();
 }
 
@@ -3501,6 +3502,7 @@ do_one_unbind (union specbinding *this_binding, bool unwinding,
   switch (this_binding->kind)
     {
     case SPECPDL_UNWIND:
+      lisp_eval_depth = this_binding->unwind.eval_depth;
       this_binding->unwind.func (this_binding->unwind.arg);
       break;
     case SPECPDL_UNWIND_ARRAY:
@@ -3595,6 +3597,7 @@ set_unwind_protect (ptrdiff_t count, void (*func) (Lisp_Object),
   p->unwind.kind = SPECPDL_UNWIND;
   p->unwind.func = func;
   p->unwind.arg = arg;
+  p->unwind.eval_depth = lisp_eval_depth;
 }
 
 void
diff --git a/src/lisp.h b/src/lisp.h
index 5ecc48b025..a7a26ef350 100644
--- a/src/lisp.h
+++ b/src/lisp.h
@@ -3071,6 +3071,7 @@ union specbinding
       ENUM_BF (specbind_tag) kind : CHAR_BIT;
       void (*func) (Lisp_Object);
       Lisp_Object arg;
+      EMACS_INT eval_depth;
     } unwind;
     struct {
       ENUM_BF (specbind_tag) kind : CHAR_BIT;
-- 
2.17.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-14 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-13 10:07 bug#33034: `unwind-protect' cleanup form is not executed if body dies in stack overflow Paul Pogonyshev
2018-10-13 10:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-10-13 10:35   ` Paul Pogonyshev
2018-10-13 10:45     ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-10-13 10:52       ` Paul Pogonyshev
2018-10-13 11:01         ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-10-13 11:29           ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-10-13 11:38             ` Paul Pogonyshev
2018-10-13 12:35               ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-10-13 14:02                 ` Paul Pogonyshev
2018-10-14 17:02 ` Paul Eggert [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3f05af02-38e2-c03a-8449-bad3d1bb7670@cs.ucla.edu \
    --to=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=33034-done@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=pogonyshev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).