From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25408: Remove Decorations Around Emacs Frame (Windows OS) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:05:55 -0500 Message-ID: <3d34793f-4b7c-d4ea-74ec-49ce84214cc8@gmail.com> References: <587499E6.9030205@gmx.at> <838tqietdj.fsf@gnu.org> <587522DB.2050105@gmx.at> <831swaepnc.fsf@gnu.org> <5875EF34.20507@gmx.at> <9efbe1e3-e8aa-f056-bc5c-5a41f10b6d42@gmail.com> <58996EED.6030601@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iPUKVmPpFN7pR8CD5e0rEAngabOAO39V4" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486472842 12275 195.159.176.226 (7 Feb 2017 13:07:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:07:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 Cc: 25408@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics , Arthur Miller Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 14:07:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cb5UI-0002rm-0X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 14:07:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53949 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb5UN-0007Dx-BZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:07:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb5UB-0007Dq-Ok for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:07:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb5U5-0006Jf-Vy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb5U5-0006JX-TA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:07:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cb5U5-0006mV-K3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:07:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25408.148647277226010 (code B ref 25408); Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2017 13:06:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58398 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cb5TH-0006lR-Rm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:06:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.75]:50189) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cb5TG-0006lB-Bo for 25408@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:06:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.189.127.106] ([18.189.127.106]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102 [212.227.15.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LkPdb-1bzpq52lvH-00cPoA; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 14:06:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <58996EED.6030601@gmx.at> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hkOWYGjz/51/q24ay24CTuYRoMO5Bkw26fLvpg9LKU7qpICTZD/ R9c6VWr/VE2slP5UfLe1OZ5tZm5O4hwseykkq97i6l8wlmAE1NthQfv+0MV17IHxOFPiurB v2cZG79/0HUCf2C4zTApHW7liIARb1j3HZ2cmTe3gPCz1ZWd1+AoFgH7fjVfICnhvF7vQzb CWbz7xdIIQbv1Syzz+RHA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:m4VYBXL4RrM=:t5U3i6uZCVU8tgrtDKWNf7 ojK/hVyqQ6ODu515dhY2aybPkYD5XtYr4eaoukQtmxj38bGI4fo6leUgUp3d403k9ogNqJ8rm d72aepY/9/Ist1x2Ji9ObVBVr7Z0vPH+8lIM5yGiavaf3IMi+C4HtREoE9yX+IjXnrBP06nv1 HMNqxeHZwWWPVIWJ/3p1Pi4XLtEA42Gf9N2+u8a3rEwiG7Xo1N2hN8qlEaa+nLKjNaycHfK6g VgnTWHeMexka3yyzkwlpMmpDnpox2sguhO7CeoScybNS4FpJL4DWryCd+Pz/9JpP4JFniFSuS fmRBDXbKvQa+dKNB84Guqfiw7bv0GO96Qs/gjDUkycGNC6dt0hyPS8h9btTEUB9dqWydeSZel YIKbCCXZ8h6BbZkFWjJIPMfq0b5o8hEGbfu2DgHgmmPjO4X3Jlo8PSP2UYip/eevbFAQCmwpE XbwC7GPmEaQ0im8l6kn/aFGM4zAyytLUVdrO7s1RJ/P0qpwJlv6sivQVn0MAM498G7raY/u3o iNCo0K8zG8fecfzatek9zJcphvTl+HEm9xc0KIy4dUSZmLWwQdK88XCvQR7J8q0EOvxIuryI3 dVDMeSl3uuDgBBfiCBkajJkO3gMLYkHS+UKCh/2+OLqqPXy/782/jcXHPmWviPCoBPYQzB4Ln 0fwuujQVMgHRo3X1P5gWcfZFWpBwfL5yTLuA5sipuur3Na6BFlYFy+Wnp2y/Awd2lfKE= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129065 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --iPUKVmPpFN7pR8CD5e0rEAngabOAO39V4 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="jkgcODtdFK6CSFJ6R8QhIKGKrRlFQXJFN"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: martin rudalics , Arthur Miller Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 25408@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <3d34793f-4b7c-d4ea-74ec-49ce84214cc8@gmail.com> Subject: Re: bug#25408: Remove Decorations Around Emacs Frame (Windows OS) References: <587499E6.9030205@gmx.at> <838tqietdj.fsf@gnu.org> <587522DB.2050105@gmx.at> <831swaepnc.fsf@gnu.org> <5875EF34.20507@gmx.at> <9efbe1e3-e8aa-f056-bc5c-5a41f10b6d42@gmail.com> <58996EED.6030601@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <58996EED.6030601@gmx.at> --jkgcODtdFK6CSFJ6R8QhIKGKrRlFQXJFN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-02-07 01:53, martin rudalics wrote: >> Are your changes available in a branch of the repo? >=20 > No. But I hope that I can post a patch by the end of this week. Great, thanks a lot! >> I'd be very happy >> to test them, and some modes like company-mode would benefit >> significantly (I tried to tackle this in "Could x-show-tip be >> reimplemented in Elisp? How does one create borderless frames from >> Elisp?" a while ago). >=20 > Creating borderless frames and giving them back their border is fairly > trivial. The greater problem is how to synchronize the behavior of suc= h > a frame with that of another one (moving, sizing, focusing, restacking > and the like) and do that consistently across our windows systems. >=20 > I've practically solved all these problems but am not yet sure whether > the issue I found in "A GTK-only problem when making frames invisible" > could have a detrimental impact. Ok; thanks for the clarification! I'm excited about this feature :) --jkgcODtdFK6CSFJ6R8QhIKGKrRlFQXJFN-- --iPUKVmPpFN7pR8CD5e0rEAngabOAO39V4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYmcY4AAoJEPqg+cTm90wjtdcP/2Jorkt03RJFn5f6fN1XrsLQ Jqrb37Iaa6s7sEf3qmM/ca6Mv6K33cfqhLMmIfb2EpJYIDw5LIz9xw6IXxxxv+qW FETgocgu1oFvB92e1yP9bsjkZUgtrkhi+L9A1vIV1O71dSq3c6gqS1oRcD0HPKF9 7n8ZhezaiIGFB/bMLLZNxR5IEBsxdBM2GSSMgN+pwl+OJwyQexE+yOc4QYKU7gOH J1j4oBCg4pEG/TgA02xQ/EecUSBwlNwnMFFHmtTPIHHailDXM6ZDN66D00TTwt6A MdcsciOpqlxkGRum3ON0GtydBeXUWxzoc/TKlr1WIuIx9rpM7Jr4LLGmjqWTvonL T9pZNU8SSARf/CPq3aE2nnLKLUHJYbABi3Oe47YTOb6UME9AqS2itpQ8o9ODDXql SMItj34V28U10d36Pq0JGjytLbXeUcKN2zjvuDt8TSqcvLWlt4OJd1vojQ8t22S8 oOsMi/8x0gTAym6DrvKeJhQwfpCeW2H8TRjYr9NuNRJvCe8AcfwzFyYGNcivHIy0 AiJwa+hYgF3jFz93U+59At6wTX5usvzBhxclcqPOjnYSFPakSvRPxC7w63Ow95cH t+vxAi7PbqIJctwKFFEOkg98Ri9T8OPxaLpIp4sJP5fzwHCT54WxB1e7uMuZpp1R AljMGep6Bioa5onsTilw =oRuB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iPUKVmPpFN7pR8CD5e0rEAngabOAO39V4--