From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Mendler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60867: 29.0.60; keymap-set-after does not accept the AFTER=t argument Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 18:18:17 +0100 Message-ID: <3d2cc069-d258-f0b6-9679-eb13a1415202@daniel-mendler.de> References: <878ri2gx3r.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> <87r0vtaxtu.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35350"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 60867@debbugs.gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 17 18:19:32 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pHpcS-00092D-Fk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 18:19:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pHpcM-0005yd-Qa; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:19:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pHpbz-0005vP-H7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pHpby-0005tb-FY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:19:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pHpby-00027Q-BD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daniel Mendler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60867 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 60867-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60867.16739759078099 (code B ref 60867); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60867) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2023 17:18:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38115 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pHpbO-00026Z-O3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:18:26 -0500 Original-Received: from server.qxqx.de ([178.63.65.180]:41435 helo=mail.qxqx.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pHpbN-00026M-BB for 60867@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:18:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qxqx.de; s=mail1392553390; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rel5PZlcj7shxtjzsbvgS1d89ePQPZCvqxZd7+yWYmY=; b=JJ+VP2HZKpBLMc/o5SQGgE2XUg 2hwEcLiyf6uK2gtcBcnmCU04XsEjaZR2ROrzqkotnAOBZZRMtlroIfgqCFE16+oJbVBmth/e/nqGe LV309dK4aVcN7G4Wt3h+eLXe3rR6wW3Q/S77EFj22GvVzLV2sGUIw14wSwL/sQljyEVU=; Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87r0vtaxtu.fsf@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:253566 Archived-At: On 1/17/23 18:13, Robert Pluim wrote: > `kbd' supports a slightly less strict syntax than `key-parse' for > historical reasons. Itʼs not something I think we should change > without good reason. Certainly not in emacs-29 keymap-lookup was added in 29. So it is still time to use key-parse instead of kbd? Daniel