From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44611: Prefix arg for xref-goto-xref Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 23:24:23 +0200 Message-ID: <3c740ee3-cc1c-e2e3-d540-7be0b37d91ef@yandex.ru> References: <87k0up68e4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <99772eb6-5a4e-7cf6-259d-0e9429e6bf97@yandex.ru> <878sb3n0a9.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <48f942f9-a557-0185-25fe-612e78cd9071@yandex.ru> <875z67gd6z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <72e9e5e9-651f-401f-2e26-faaac1b7fdb5@yandex.ru> <87v9cxleff.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <834kkhtaxm.fsf@gnu.org> <874kkgswg2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83v9cwsct7.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0tab3y0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83pn31rg5a.fsf@gnu.org> <877dp9ycq6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <837dp8r250.fsf@gnu.org> <4a0c8870-e2e7-97c7-5808-afa704ebee13@yandex.ru> <83mty4pj0u.fsf@gnu.org> <1d9bf365-224f-bb41-d79c-e22d110b41e3@yandex.ru> <83eejgpbs8.fsf@gnu.org> <9fa9d286-4497-baa9-15cd-1ef31651781f@yandex.ru> <83a6u4p8nz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33540"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: juri@linkov.net, joaotavora@gmail.com, 44611@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 23 22:25:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ksBdB-0008dE-OS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 22:25:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55638 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ksBdA-0001gc-Gl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 16:25:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ksBd0-0001gC-Az for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 16:25:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ksBd0-0003Ix-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 16:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ksBcz-00025y-Vc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 16:25:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 21:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44611 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 44611-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44611.16087586748016 (code B ref 44611); Wed, 23 Dec 2020 21:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44611) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2020 21:24:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54303 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ksBcY-00025E-KO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 16:24:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:45356) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ksBcW-00024v-V6 for 44611@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 16:24:33 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f45.google.com with SMTP id qw4so921437ejb.12 for <44611@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:24:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W3MZhQu06YS0ySrCL7U/Zs+sULCgRtNW4Vy8xkPrQ0Q=; b=vFLWTMAxBTYaqFKCw4FpCcF4A+xNr0WAhvZwk5Q/wF4FQ7k7i9Bvl1fpzui827+CsU CNlSWNdisY3QHJHpxs1t7oOXTyAJF/FoDKt/OdqSA1oC9M5k00cfKJN1PW2hRyW0novY vV1ygbxO3U6KVQlpvXdYVjVr+pnFGSL6d1fedCymyEu7/lzzM/reIvUBbD4cZ71LZL3y AZbahJz67czCltHFFl7E4wACw4rn6edgkYwNC7Zeu8JoJlGGFbLIbylUSVjbr8OKNnSu ujlXMnZOWbgoiv/Euw0c38HAPis60dEbmtYYdFKLBZw+d7POjyP+evvn/cncMDv89/1d EpgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=W3MZhQu06YS0ySrCL7U/Zs+sULCgRtNW4Vy8xkPrQ0Q=; b=BqXeASmIyODajmu5t21i5iVhBTq0qY7C/OUGh9pEMScmWWkcfdL0/apQiS6iH/ErEM +rWqkvb+X/tEYMUhY98KiN93XU+V5OefYRGyM1iuy8tMrnuunC5EHt8/BPBB4SPzWV5E P+JOOIRpt8ZvzYVV+m+JeVhMkGEanDxSjE8lfQUG+SrT/7qnnzx0V6qZw3cEuncPcHIQ vDtT1iCqGTCNeF22A2HlPP6U29Cj4xI9oyAyA5dOva8FVe27ctXXx+kDGaItTIdVLFfb cj19fsNUArhnIxiEuNYZ94uOMiPN47CJSKzj0S1RPe0Lx/rXzdUStAqVAv0TsAsRDco9 Yo6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5334PmQRmW1yBwO09zymnNgtsBH7ebGV9y7NKGkf0gJJEUGnFbmL ov5yUrNks6Xp3tKvE6HcjtHtWqrP+w1jiA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJylOw4VEC16Disl0lhkvz0L+s3dnL1d8Tn+AhWJLtAJzNyPkcSGgPuB5adGh8i851kwBR+frg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7215:: with SMTP id m21mr15987189ejk.248.1608758666776; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:24:26 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z13sm4731237edq.48.2020.12.23.13.24.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:24:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83a6u4p8nz.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:196642 Archived-At: On 23.12.2020 22:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > If you want to continue this discussion, please drop the attitude and > try to see the issue from my POV. Otherwise I see no reason to > continue, as I've-been-there-done-that too many times. Could you try seeing it from my POV? This is the first time I've heard about a rule like that regarding key bindings (and not just changes in existing functions, ones that would break existing configurations and third-party code). If I knew about it, I wouldn't have approved that key binding in the first place, those 4 years ago. Because "we can't change it later" is a pretty high standard for acceptance. And now it feels like you're like changing the rules under my feet. It's not a good way to make a subsystem maintainer feel. Since there apparently was some sort of misunderstanding here, could we maybe proceed like this: - You allow me the change of this binding, this one time. - You add some documentation to our "best practices" somewhere, which describes this rule, so that I/we can be careful in the future with additions to new keybindings, and with changes to existing ones. And if that rule is documented already, could you please point it out?