From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#265: Build error with _UNICODE on w32. Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:06:00 -0500 Message-ID: <3aoc5i97g7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <4v4p8xy1q8.fsf@otsukakj.co.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299782228 28935 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2011 18:37:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 265@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 10 19:37:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxkjM-0000Hg-JO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:37:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35749 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxkjM-0003N7-3R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56147 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxkjI-0003My-2S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:36:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxkjH-0006VD-3N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:36:55 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34899) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxkjH-0006V8-0r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:36:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxkGM-0005pJ-5k; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 265 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 265-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B265.129978037022329 (code B ref 265); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 265) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2011 18:06:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxkFV-0005o2-9o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:06:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxkFT-0005na-BB; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:06:07 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37293) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxkFN-0000XS-FP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:06:01 -0500 X-Spook: JPL NASA EuroFed Consul kilderkin Nazi cryptographic DRM X-Ran: \`=GcX=Ir~!:xL>tJp{L@&S-OMkhdu\}Bl)!>&U9?TNoR7Q6'4=W;NotN;f1pH]8`r_Z)j X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 04:08:10 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:07:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44871 Archived-At: reopen 265 stop Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Actually, I'm sure that this can be reproduced at will. Building a > Windows port with -D_UNICODE is simply not supported. I'm not > surprised that the resulting binary crashes. Oh, OK. I'm glad someone actually explained this.