From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57207: 29.0.50; Fontification is slow after e7b5912b23 (Improvements to long lines handling) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:03:09 +0000 Message-ID: <3a1232a17b32ec05f762@heytings.org> References: <87bksmx1j1.fsf@localhost> <5900f208367791fbdfe2@heytings.org> <83bksmka08.fsf@gnu.org> <83sflyi686.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8293"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 57207@debbugs.gnu.org, yantar92@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 15 11:24:05 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oNWKJ-0001rg-MW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:24:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49800 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oNWKI-0008D9-NJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 05:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oNW0w-0000wK-98 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 05:04:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oNW0v-0000f1-Um for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 05:04:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oNW0v-0006f3-QB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 05:04:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57207 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57207-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57207.166055419225549 (code B ref 57207); Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Aug 2022 09:03:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40850 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oNW08-0006e1-4C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 05:03:12 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:53908) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oNW06-0006dt-LO for 57207@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 05:03:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1660554190; bh=VOHZcTJXFdTxeAfGE0H428UElLWyz9ZU8n0JGcz34ho=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=jNY7lMG/3agB7TzqxQSGJUIPcMJpNN/rNJoEbR8gGxzNdX9q0S1nMypDuFvbPZ6IL 20qmo5uLNemq5QWpo60V3iyklqaMJw/YfhOoKwiJR1MZL/CEbLtedwm7WLgMajQeEC uBYzH5/5EcZPeIW6CwNdMF7y2iSQ07J3BDE78+p6WVE///jdBnp/Td5Bz3KiI6xqMm wvKWIHzS+JG2xrGW3/btbmJ8x6L3L4Y3QPPrOZsGP4/4/8BCCVW+2F0pCEvk+IjFg8 o/eSqSO6k6qUNeYt2cKrvVw1YYpfeRxYfzMquGVWu7dRUr0CAm+GkFXreucHgd6Xks +igRfHaGsT0Dw== In-Reply-To: <83sflyi686.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:239761 Archived-At: >> Maybe we should measure the increment in MODIFF across the calls to >> fontification-functions in handle_fontified_prop, and correct >> UNCHANGED_MODIFIED by the same increment when fontification-functions >> return? > > Hmm... I'm having second thoughts on this idea. Let me think some more. > I think it would be better to wait for Ihor's feedback before trying to fix his problem. Ihor?