Re: don't really need new shell, just cd me

Re: don't really need new shell, just cd me

[Kevin Rodgers]

Dan Jacobson wrote:

> Often I do M-x shell and find myself switched to a shell session I
> started hours ago and forgot about.
> 
> So I kill it and simply do M-x shell again to get what I want.

Google for switch-to-shell.el

-- 
<a href="mailto:&lt;kevin.rodgers&#64;ihs.com&gt;">Kevin Rodgers</a>

Re: don't really need new shell, just cd me

[Francesco Potorti`]

Kevin Rodgers <kevin.rodgers@ihs.com> writes:
>Google for switch-to-shell.el

Tried, but no answers :-(

Re: don't really need new shell, just cd me

[Adrian Mrva]

> Tried, but no answers :-(

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=switch-to-shell.el

Re: don't really need new shell, just cd me

[John Paul Wallington]

> >Google for switch-to-shell.el
> 
> Tried, but no answers :-(

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=m3r8gqntqu.fsf%40localhost.localdomain

don't really need new shell, just cd me

[Dan Jacobson]

Often I do M-x shell and find myself switched to a shell session I
started hours ago and forgot about.

So I kill it and simply do M-x shell again to get what I want.

But then I think about the kids in Nairobi without any shells and what
happens if some right-to-lifer finds out my habits.

Ok, I guess I can do 
  <escape> x C-f C-a C-k C-g <escape> x s h e <return> c d SPC C-y <return>
instead of 
  <escape> x s h e <return> C-x k <return> <escape> x s h e <return>
or
  <escape> x s h e <return> C-x k <return> C-x <escape> <escape> <escape> p <return>
-- 
http://jidanni.org/ Taiwan(04)25854780