From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kaelbling Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: `print' does not print Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 11:08:47 -0400 Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc. Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <3CB6F87F.3FD6435C@sgi.com> References: <15520.45112.118124.712072@jupiter.akutech-local.de> <15521.35374.659644.387438@jupiter.akutech-local.de> <1659-Fri12Apr2002123712+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <15542.50594.404120.372721@jupiter.akutech-local.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018624712 3984 127.0.0.1 (12 Apr 2002 15:18:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16w2op-000129-00 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:18:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16w2of-0000HF-00; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 11:18:21 -0400 Original-Received: from delysid.gnu.org ([158.121.106.20]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16w2lW-00003j-00; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 11:15:06 -0400 Original-Received: from zok.sgi.com ([204.94.215.101]) by delysid.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #2) id 16w2gS-0007La-00; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 11:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from nodin.corp.sgi.com (nodin.corp.sgi.com [192.26.51.193]) by zok.sgi.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with ESMTP id g3CG9fBA001864; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:09:42 -0700 Original-Received: from sgihud.hudson.sgi.com (sgihud.hudson.sgi.com [169.238.41.4]) by nodin.corp.sgi.com (8.11.4/8.11.4/nodin-1.0) with ESMTP id g3CF9ep39652943; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from sgi.com (cf-vpn-hw-drk-1.corp.sgi.com [134.15.81.98]) by sgihud.hudson.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA31474; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 11:09:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en Original-To: Ralf Fassel Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:606 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:606 Okay with me! I'll try again with the new bugfix release and see if I can come up with a more coherent explanation for any problems. Thanks, David Ralf Fassel wrote: > > * Eli Zaretskii > | It is my impression that removing the SGI-specific treatment of the > | `.got' sections from unexelf.c is a good idea, but I'm unsure > | whether it will have adverse effects on some (older?) versions of > | the SGI development tools, and if so whether saying in etc/MACHINES > | that users should upgrade to newer devo is good enough. > > Since we do not seem to be able to recreate the exact conditions to > check why these were necessary (David?), and since an OS upgrade (Good > Thing [TM] anyway) solves the issue I have brought up, I think adding > advice to etc/MACHINES is enough. > > R' -- David KAELBLING Silicon Graphics Computer Systems 1 Cabot Rd, suite 250; Hudson, MA 01749 781.839.2157, fax ...2357