From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: fabrice nicol Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47408: Etags support for Mercury [v0.5] Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 22:49:19 +0200 Message-ID: <39f683d3-65d7-a7d9-18b1-cf6dfa7d254a@gmail.com> References: <70503251-f8ea-9006-b7e7-b13b93bb71de@gmail.com> <838s4gxurw.fsf@gnu.org> <53162dfb-0715-3077-78d1-3a8340943f2f@gmail.com> <838s3y6kaq.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0n7iarj.fsf@gnu.org> <65f059b1-149d-146d-3b8d-36db60ff1044@gmail.com> <87o8cin9fb.fsf@tucano.isti.cnr.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33091"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 Cc: 47408-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 06 22:49:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lpzhm-0008Tn-Fi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 22:49:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46404 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpzhl-0000kR-H3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 16:49:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpzhe-0000hF-Ku for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 16:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42459) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpzhe-0007VZ-ER for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 16:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpzhe-0007r7-3f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 16:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: fabrice nicol Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 20:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 47408-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D47408.162301252030168 (code D ref 47408); Sun, 06 Jun 2021 20:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47408-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2021 20:48:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54005 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpzhD-0007qR-VL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 16:48:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com ([209.85.221.52]:33634) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpzh8-0007qA-H0 for 47408-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 16:48:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id a20so15167892wrc.0 for <47408-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 13:48:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=eK9lHzZ0qPRdCIO2+mDaXq2HABAhq/Lcy0HFC1gHyXs=; b=CXENAJ7csPISMjlyISch9T1R644l/PHOOp8qqb4ee9L8twm8MSNASrS+N7PUKKB75J VyGDWIS8tHwZG576zO7VgV2DEvmB021or+rWzxEahOvg7r0JZ3q42cx2vof6LaZ4OmwA Oo9lol6whsTSfuaQNmkKcImCIcRsxiiXllyXKOhE9Z9OlDzzGD51FkJ0mWh9HoZoUiTL dE9gG7AyHy24Dg0+N6i4jd4BbVuT3kDf/BZQDQxEoLql949rIXgNvXs6WgkesuVJry6f jFAtntIZhbQ8mpDVUazfUswNMI39/5sXfO55ODKQxSEzzOdj0gMyvQ9pbuDF/nNngz8g /3fA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=eK9lHzZ0qPRdCIO2+mDaXq2HABAhq/Lcy0HFC1gHyXs=; b=qdHeFub5Uh4F75LHi9G7ETpRtE3PgpGTJdbnjszROE4OKbY9ePTWa7661kgKVzxuF5 VwdLk9Wks6IlMzuXC/fIj8iZuJSBaW8Mr68X4fEa2DRLy9rRexQRub/Zw8dV6qYFkeor kLzOiVZrBgKo62wus+Xa11VDfDC50QmdM2ZHe6eiNw23/Tp6SriP76HLwHozWUeqy6uz zWLjDz/I36omWA189TMnmVUuUS1OFMb3nzHGJn1h2VNYZ3yk+n3ed0EeUrCYmGtzPKze nplefS3v81bh9EQOutmtoZNt2paYTtZBX0hWqADgkmEE+RRqTPcF8MtHOvEgqQTkOUIQ YhZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FshjYpHUybgzOfzujQsnvQS4ELmmhxF3y0pUEErZO+oAo12ZZ ageTFS78P3EbMhB9y1UcMz8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxW7s+Dyngooiu9zn/J2ruZziD+AOy1/Z61IUUxclQBNQG8sArWTc84kLtZMS9N9QfpKdtqcw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5151:: with SMTP id u17mr13290831wrt.302.1623012504563; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 13:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:cb1d:88b9:5c00:7b73:7901:965e:8523? ([2a01:cb1d:88b9:5c00:7b73:7901:965e:8523]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m21sm9807793wms.42.2021.06.06.13.48.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Jun 2021 13:48:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87o8cin9fb.fsf@tucano.isti.cnr.it> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208156 Archived-At: > Yes, unless I am mistaken, ctags has no practical use outside of the >> C-family language domain. > That's difficult to tell for me. However, etags provides ctags support > for all languages it knows about. I may be missing something, but I > think Mercury would be the first exception. If that's the case, maybe > it would be worth adding a comment telling so. ctags only differs from etags by the fact that its output is Vim-compatible. But it so happens that Mercury has superior in-built support for Vim tagging (the core team use Vim). So ctags would not actually be used by users with Vim-compatibility requirements, they would just use Mercury tagging on Vim.