From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54804: 29.0.50; zap-to-char: case sensitive for upper-case letter Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 14:53:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <39917dfe-5c28-96a-13d2-1f4bdaef449f@gmail.com> References: <87ee27fd1a.fsf@gmail.com> <83bkxaaj45.fsf@gnu.org> <878rs55m81.fsf@gmail.com> <834k2t1cva.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilqdnl8z.fsf@gmail.com> <83bkw4s4ln.fsf@gnu.org> <87fslgnn9h.fsf@gmail.com> <87lev85d36.fsf@gmail.com> <877d6sum2c.fsf@igel.home> <4548a66-c8f8-57de-58db-6241a1f16cc4@gmail.com> <8735hguk0u.fsf@igel.home> <218f952c-747d-c32-5bce-5ad078a51f41@gmail.com> <878rr6oidh.fsf@gmail.com> <83czgind12.fsf@gnu.org> <874k1onxs1.fsf@gmail.com> <83pmkcgwku.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1329"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 54804@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha , juri@linkov.net, Eli Zaretskii , uyennhi.qm@gmail.com, spwhitton@spwhitton.name To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 17 15:34:00 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nqxKm-00006Z-0r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 15:33:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51660 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqxKl-0006XJ-1v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 09:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqwjA-0005bL-5G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 08:55:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqwj8-0007Ro-E1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 08:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nqwj8-0001On-A1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 08:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 12:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54804 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 54804-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54804.16527920515297 (code B ref 54804); Tue, 17 May 2022 12:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54804) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2022 12:54:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56038 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nqwiJ-0001NM-4J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 08:54:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com ([209.85.208.42]:35753) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nqwiH-0001N6-6X for 54804@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2022 08:54:09 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id c10so1133642edr.2 for <54804@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 May 2022 05:54:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version; bh=peV99xOlefSZ3wAuqKYb/mxz47X7kIsFcqe9vlJro1Q=; b=UEEc6j0gI0CIz7Wc+1u6pBjzO0leW0an8DGDtV6KKSHMDkzG1sL1eFPvazl9T/gI/5 i6ZKrvYZPNSdkY9ayAoHVkeDPwMehRQmhAJ2xTOac9Ob6x6tWRvvYvp5E5R6BR8+184Q 3WMcwFl0DZq3XnkO0Ovopr+GoqmVZ11yMptOo5NPU1cRRjqc/USlv15pqFKbjNrHQVkR OamcF4bcERq0u2+sND5C808i2bJ0fiQJwxmKpqVdNCL9BYobqLwmKp2YEUewkOiLA+iD vT5J/4F2BFog3xpzdmbm4KFA4Te+7WP2MRRY5+kEpyw2kzdE0OtpfkhU3ucHserPrf43 PDcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:mime-version; bh=peV99xOlefSZ3wAuqKYb/mxz47X7kIsFcqe9vlJro1Q=; b=EVwMkPwMzk5PXO2Fwed2jCfLnJ8JCYaQc7osLbG6qtb6jDcXim1D9IdJHTMyuMsdYi 3ypvOZGCd5fwH6R4x5qjv1rzV9+DGKQDWbM6FU+1DGP0sNkaXCSrLUXEnSlSuh3UXhvx IYVniJ2xDuituHG+OuQK8oSgn2jVBWOOU7f3lVcaQcBfZeNek2qthOgHjxJth0sgwD/y KBd/o825Jj2Z4C/kMUiwqPQ4uFtb30b0mMRMoy5M0fQSd0dXIxPsma0DqEMW73GSOYUS 6df7KyKx8yNcGVRsXije49uhNRmz8spx9/h/oDlH8Hrm/T1jqE5gcNI1wVBKs/PYVhA9 9Dag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533pgG6YdGi4W+cESJ/rj4kaOe4AbciOFE4d6RkWixXPFaDzVD6q GGSHQw1lDkgw4G573xjBlD8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLR1tv6INDbEJ7+d0BhdjXzay7RhFd+hsYvuetKJxf6ZWhL4WuGfK5LKbN3BdxrQYRNNhGcg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c595:0:b0:42a:b571:2726 with SMTP id g21-20020aa7c595000000b0042ab5712726mr9409803edq.48.1652792042906; Tue, 17 May 2022 05:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from eprince ([193.118.249.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r6-20020aa7d146000000b0042ab9da73e6sm2481972edo.94.2022.05.17.05.54.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 May 2022 05:54:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:232438 Archived-At: On Tue, 17 May 2022, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> I want the analog behavior for zap-to... commands: automatic >>> case sensitivity when the char is uppercase. >>> I want this behavior on interactive calls only, for instance when users >>> do `M-z'. >> >> As I said I disagree: these are DWIMish features that are best >> reserved for interactive invocation. In calls from Lisp, it is >> confusing to have the behavior change so drastically depending on the >> letter-case of an argument. > > Am I misunderstanding something or are you two violently agreeing? We both agree with a sword in a hand. I don't want to change the behavior on Lisp call! Just let me know the nice way to detect that the call is interactive and then I will inject the feature :-)