From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69233: 30.0.50; project-files + project-find-file is slow in large repositories Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 22:11:43 +0200 Message-ID: <391ea08d-9d52-4f03-a602-045b76ac862c@gutov.dev> References: <86y1bhr47o.fsf@gnu.org> <86frxpr1yl.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9177"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: sbaugh@janestreet.com, 69233@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 18 21:13:01 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rbnX2-0002DF-MZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 21:13:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbnWl-0004hR-10; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:12:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbnWj-0004gt-AL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:12:41 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbnWj-0005bh-1q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:12:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rbnX3-0004Fq-Li for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:13:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 20:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69233 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69233-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69233.170828713516291 (code B ref 69233); Sun, 18 Feb 2024 20:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69233) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2024 20:12:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38418 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rbnWJ-0004Eh-0X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:12:15 -0500 Original-Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:40757) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rbnWG-0004EP-KR for 69233@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:12:14 -0500 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF30320092C; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:11:46 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:11:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1708287105; x=1708373505; bh=tDfFef92uIBbmZQyQeJuf++P9ziZOX7yW2qmOT1eQgE=; b= INH5HT8C+buW4gX+owbAkDsktFBnUbAy+IrCHEMiAjtniM5G7vfQ5DOuiYNsqXlF vbX3bPLZV8/5S6P8dwLLKLTJR0iuo99NCJFn/+mbCVpkpglEvD3q8eSznYeq6995 0868a9Ud6isV50lNosj3VFaBSJPY1djlPDsGHd8rjAA7bFgPXhsrNAs6XGS46UyY JwGzeBgX+W+bEqgeDEuVlpbvd7DslrlNaJoxoOCkcJl47Xyy5UsKNJH3CDAV8Tfs 6hRzIk00lzyUxoR4zlUxgo2AENcRhrQqexUOQd9x3Z+AumAtn4vQnlL8wxi/XEjV M42g8t3WkjJQZus1veUtlQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1708287105; x= 1708373505; bh=tDfFef92uIBbmZQyQeJuf++P9ziZOX7yW2qmOT1eQgE=; b=q CXIcz8FqMpFryD81dmIFN3foZsgf2gJ6WEb6BhuH36GwyyWv8ni20ckE5t6+eEXk tPJvg7PAMmgalARG8aetrhNXy7exfSRu2BiVrqBx1DUD9xvkM6MNXH8o7qHgcz6A /ZZiyWXAbswCJqXvdGzWFWnQkSnuTQITxWwTG+XmhH12dqvAryBEPM7FAApoCRJu ZUBuXhqBnxtoWA3nHVnmhe5rrKNBdEOVdsollPgqUpjo+aazyXNW3Ow6kE9MNQGq JQ2cGHYSqeXcyZZNiP8JMhmprQZqfHeOevpRQmMeNoxLmhTxT2/zfBNhbZrAvk2Z Oidgudh3XZjNjVcMyg6Tw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdeigddufeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtvdejnecuhfhrohhmpeffmhhi thhrhicuifhuthhovhcuoegumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepteduleejgeehtefgheegjeekueehvdevieekueeftddvtdevfefhvdevgedu jeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepug hmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:11:44 -0500 (EST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <86frxpr1yl.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280213 Archived-At: On 18/02/2024 21:45, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 21:42:37 +0200 >> Cc:69233@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> >> On 18/02/2024 20:56, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> This is a duplicate of another bug report you submitted not long ago. >> Any reason I didn't receive the first one to my inbox? > I don't have the foggiest, sorry. It seems Spencer didn't get the confirmation email either, or he wouldn't resubmit.