From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22604: 24.5; (elisp) `Key Binding Conventions': what about other `C-c' keys? Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:48:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <38cef267-d54f-40d5-9282-563615551367@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454975364 11234 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2016 23:49:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 23:49:24 +0000 (UTC) To: 22604@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 09 00:49:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvYM-00027w-5d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:49:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49956 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvYL-0000el-GX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:49:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46641) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvYH-0000ee-Jf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:49:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvYE-00034D-Ro for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvYE-000349-O5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvYE-0006pd-GH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:49:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 23:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 22604 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.145497530226203 (code B ref -1); Mon, 08 Feb 2016 23:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2016 23:48:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60667 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvXZ-0006oZ-M7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:48:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvXX-0006oJ-Ex for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:48:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvXR-0002yq-Fd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:48:14 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvXR-0002ym-DF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:48:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46468) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvXQ-0000Uy-AT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:48:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvXN-0002yC-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:48:12 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:39003) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSvXN-0002xw-EH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:48:09 -0500 Original-Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u18Nm5wP025925 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 23:48:07 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u18Nm4mZ003339 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 23:48:05 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u18Nm406027975 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 23:48:04 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9 (901082) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112759 Archived-At: This node mentions about keys following `C-c', but only `{', `}', `<', `>', `:', `;', control chars, digits, letters, and "other punctuation". What about keys `-', `+', `@', `#', `%', `^', `&', `*', `=3D', etc.? These are not mentioned. I think, based on the mention of "other punctuation" coming just after mention of the explicit list `{', `}', `<', `>', `:', `;', that all such chars are intended by "other punctuation". I guess this because `<' and `>', at least are not typically punctuation. Could this doc please corrected to cover the cases of characters not mentioned that are not really punctuation? I'd propose that they should be explicitly covered by what is said for "other punctuation": they should be reserved for minor modes. But regardless of what the decision is, even if it is to not put any restriction on the use of the unmentioned chars, can we please make the convention explicit in their regard, so there is no question, e.g., whether a sequence such as `C-c -' is reserved for minor modes? Thx. In GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (i686-pc-mingw32) of 2015-04-11 on LEG570 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --prefix=3D3D/c/usr --host=3D3Di686-pc-mingw32'