From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ilya N. Golubev" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: comint loses prompt boundary Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:48:30 +0300 Message-ID: <37mz5o7mb5.fsf_-_@mo.msk.ru> References: <16k64g20tu.fsf@mo.msk.ru> <59ejumjzz2.fsf@mo.msk.ru> <843bazvd1b.fsf@mo.msk.ru> <87lklbu7nb.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <887iwvis8x.fsf@mo.msk.ru> <887iwvis8x.fsf@mo.msk.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166263197 4925 80.91.229.10 (16 Dec 2006 09:59:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 16 10:59:55 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GvWKd-0003xt-LW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:59:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GvWKd-0001hX-74 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:59:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GvMn5-0003pL-Hf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:48:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GvMn5-0003p8-0E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:48:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GvMn4-0003p5-RM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:48:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.213.85.9] (helo=d-fens.mopniei.ru) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GvMn2-0003fM-Lq; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:48:33 -0500 Original-Received: from d-fens.mopniei.ru (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by d-fens.mopniei.ru (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id kBFNmUWN021275 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:48:30 +0300 Original-Received: (from gin@localhost) by d-fens.mopniei.ru (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id kBFNmUGt021274; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:48:30 +0300 X-Authentication-Warning: d-fens.mopniei.ru: gin set sender to gin@mo.msk.ru using -f Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:49:09 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.20 (linux) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:58:48 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:15468 Archived-At: > `inhibit-field-text-motion' is not a user option. Confirming that it is not marked so, thus correcting the misstatemet in my <887iwvis8x.fsf@mo.msk.ru>. The rest of it, wrt why (the equivalent of) it being user option is useful and desired, still holds. That is, it is at least very convenient to be able to disregard fields in point movement commands, primarily big- block ones, like `W' and other in viper vi state. Still fields should be honored in commands / functions specifically intended for comint mode, for buffers with this particular field structure.